99-029
Response August 29, 2000
REQUEST LETTER
99‑029
April
22, 1999
Ref: 1. Third party drop shipments
2. Resale
certificate from our customers= customer
3. How
long is a blanket certificate valid
4. What
items are taxable
Dear sirs:
In an effort to be in compliance and to
render our best service to our customers, we are currently updating our tax
information on issues in your state with regards to our obligation to collect
sales and/or use tax in your state.
We are requesting in writing letter ruling
on:
1. Third
party drop shipment ‑ the typical structure of the transaction finds an
out-of-state dealer AA@ registered for the collection of sales and
use tax in >said= state. AA@ sells to an out‑of‑town state dealer AB@ who is unregistered in 'said' state.
AA@ ships the product to a point in >said= state to AB@=s customer AC@. My
question is what is AA@'s responsibility for sales or use tax?
2. Resale
certificate from AC@. If
my customers' customer (AB@' s AC@), issues a valid resale to AB@, can I accept that to relieve me from collecting tax?
3. How
long is a blanket resale certificate valid?
4. We
sell store fixtures. We separately
state on each invoice.
A. Net for product
B. Freight- by common carrier
C. Delivery - by our truck
D. Installation‑contracted (not done by
our employees)
Which items are taxable?
Your response to these issues is greatly
appreciated. Please mail or fax (972‑563-6137)
as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
RESPONSE
LETTER
August 29, 2000
RE: Utah
Tax Liability for an Out-of-State Vendor
Dear NAME,
We have received your request for an advisory
opinion concerning your company=s obligation to collect and remit Utah sales and use tax on sales made
to Utah customers. We shall address
your questions in the order you presented them.
QUESTION 1. You describe a situation
where your company, (AA@), sells an item of tangible personal
property to another company, (AB@). AB@ then sells this item to its customer, (AC@), who is located in Utah. AA@ then ships the item directly to AC@. Both AA@ and AB@ are companies located outside of Utah, and while AA@ is registered with Utah to collect and remit sales tax to Utah, AB@ is not. We assume for purposes
of this opinion that AB@ is not registered with Utah because it has
no sales tax nexus with Utah and, thus, is not required to be registered.
It is assumed that the AC@ in this question is the final consumer, because Question #2 addresses
the situation where AC@ is not the final consumer. Under these circumstances, neither AA@ nor AB@ should be required to collect and remit Utah
sales tax on this transaction.[1] However, because AA@ is registered with Utah for sales and use tax purposes, it must
document its exempt sale to AB@; otherwise it can be held liable for Utah
sales tax on the transaction. Utah Code
Ann. '59-12-106(2); Utah Admin. Code R865-19S-23 (ARule 23").
To document your exempt sale to AB@, our current policy requires that you have AB@ complete a Utah sales tax exemption certificate (Form TC721)
indicating that its purchases from you are for resale. In the space which asks for the Utah sales
tax number on the Form TC721, AB@ would instead use its home-state sales tax
number as AB@ is not registered in Utah.
Your company should retain this document in your records as evidence of
the exempt sale. However, as an
alternative, you may keep on record a letter from AB@ stating that AB@ has no nexus with Utah for sales tax
purposes under Utah Code Ann.'59-12-107 and that items purchased by AB@ from your company are intended for
resale. The advantage to this
alternative is that it alerts AB@ to ascertain whether or not it has sales tax
nexus with Utah. In addition to the
exemption certificate, Rule 23 also requires that you keep a copy of the sales
invoice showing the name and identity of your customer, AB@.
QUESTION 2. This question involves a
situation almost identical to that in Question 1. The only difference here is that the Utah customer, AC@, is not the final consumer of the item, but is buying the item for
resale. In this situation where both
transactions are for resale, AA@ would typically receive an exemption certificate
from AB@, and AB@ would receive a separate exemption certificate from AC@. You ask specifically if you
can accept and keep on record the exemption certificate issued from AC@ to AB@ instead of requiring AB@ to also complete a separate exemption
certificate relating to the original transaction. AC@>s exemption certificate shows that the item you sold AB@ has since been resold to AC@.
Accordingly, it not only provides evidence that the sale from AB@ to AC@ is exempt, but also that the sale from AA@ to AB@ was for resale and, thus, also exempt. In this situation where neither transaction
is subject to taxation, the exemption certificate issued by AC@ to AB@ is adequate evidence that AA@ has no Utah sale tax liability.
QUESTION 3. How long is a resale
exemption valid? The exemption
certificate is valid until it is revoked by the vendor or the Tax
Commission. If the exemption
certificate is accepted in good faith, it releases the vendor from liability
for uncollected sales tax. As a routine
matter, we suggest that new exemption certificates be obtained every three
years. We also recommend that you renew
any master exemption certificate whenever you are aware that a customer=s business activities have changed or
whenever changes in the law are likely to impact that customer=s exempt status. However, as long as you have an exemption certificate on file,
you are not liable for an exemption claimed in error. Instead, we will look to the party claiming the exemption for any
sales tax due.
QUESTION 4. You list four charges that
you separately invoice when selling store fixtures, then ask which of the four
are taxable. Because a third-party drop
shipment sale from your company to AB@ is exempt under the resale exemption, we
assume you ask this question in regards to a direct sale made by your company
to a Utah customer. The following
answers reflect that assumption. You
may also find helpful the enclosed Utah Tax Commission Publication 42, which
offers sales tax guidance on the sale and installation of tangible personal
property that is affixed to real property.
Store fixtures may either be considered personal property or real
property after their installation, depending on the nature of their
installation. The tax consequences, as
explained below, will depend upon this determination.
A.
Net for Product. We assume this term refers to the price at
which you sell an item. We also assume
that you are not considered a real property contractor. The sales price of tangible personal
property is taxable to the final consumer of the property. Thus, your company should collect sales tax
on the price of tangible personal property sold to Utah customers when the sale
of that property does not include installation so that it becomes part of the
realty.
However, if your company also installs the tangible personal property so
that it becomes part of the realty, there has not been a sale of tangible
personal property to your Utah customer.
In this situation, you would not charge sales tax on the price of the
item to your Utah customer. Instead,
your company is considered the final consumer of the tangible personal
property. Utah Admin. Code R865-19S-58. As such, you would report and submit a use
tax to Utah based on the amount you paid for the item, unless Utah sales tax
has already been paid on your purchase of the item. Should you have already paid sales tax on the item to another
state, the amount paid to another state may be credited against your Utah use tax
liability.
B. Freight by Common Carrier. If
the item being shipped is exempt from taxation, the transportation charges
associated with the sale are also exempt.
On the other hand, if the item being shipped is taxable, the
transportation charges are usually taxable, too, as part of the sales price of
the item. However, there is an
exemption from sales tax for transportation charges, if stated separately, when
the freight is shipped by common carrier.
However, the transportation charges must satisfy all of the following
conditions, as set forth in Utah Admin. Code R865-19S-71 to qualify for the
exemption:
1.
Shipment must take place by means of common carrier.
2.
Charges must be segregated and listed separately.
3. Charges must reflect the actual cost of
shipping the particular tangible personal property by common carrier.
4.
Shipment of the tangible personal property must take place after passage
of title.
a)
Shipment of the tangible personal property takes place after passage of
title if the terms of the sale or lease are F.O.B. origin or F.O.B. shipping
point.
b) If
the invoice does not indicate an F.O.B. point, and a common carrier is used, it
is assumed the terms are F.O.B. origin.
c) In
all other cases, the shipment of tangible personal property takes place before
passage of title.
C.
Delivery - by Vendor=s Truck. When the tangible personal property is
subject to taxation and the vendor uses its own truck for delivery, the
transportation charges, even if separately stated, are generally taxable. If the contract requires the vendor to
deliver or ship goods to a buyer, title to the property passes upon delivery to
the place agreed upon unless the contract explicitly provides otherwise. Utah Admin. Code R865‑19S‑31. Accordingly, unless you and your customer
explicitly agree that title to taxable personal property (and the risks of loss
and other benefits and burdens of ownership) passes prior to it being
delivered, the transportation charges are taxable when you deliver it in your
own truck.
D. Installation ‑ Contracted (Not Installed
by Our Employees). Charges for labor to install tangible
personal property are taxable, unless the personal property is installed in
connection with real property. Utah
Admin. Code R865-19S-78(A).
Accordingly, installation charges, if separately stated, are not taxable
when the personal property becomes part of the realty or when the personal
property is affixed to the realty, even though it does not become part of the
realty.
If your company is not required under its
contract to install the personal property it sold and your customer separately
contracts with another entity to install the property, your company has no
responsibility to collect and remit sales tax on any taxable installation
charges. However, if you are required
under your contract to install the personal property you sold, you have the
responsibility to collect and remit any taxable installation charges, even if
you Acontract out@ the installation of the property to another party.
Please contact us if you have any other
questions.
For the Commission,
Marc B. Johnson
Commissioner
[1] However,
the consumer, AC,@ would be required to directly report and pay to the Tax Commission the
Utah use tax that is due on the sale.