99-007
Response May 4, 1999
REQUEST LETTER
Dear Chairman McKeown.
As you may know, the COMPANY is expanding their CITY
plant to enhance our manufacturing organization We have taken on new
contracts that require additional space and employment needs at this particular
plant. This expansion will include new manufacturing and administrative
services, along with the renovation of our current building that will support
additional equipment used in our manufacturing process.
COMPANY is a
manufacturing firm that produces control motions in a broad spectrum of
essential uses. COMPANY has over
##### product lines for hydraulic,
pneumatic and electromechanical application in some ##### industrial and aerospace markets. SPECIFIC
DESCRIPTION.
This expansion will require new support equipment that
will include two new centrifugal chillers, which will be used exclusively in
the manufacturing facility, and a new boiler system that service both
manufacturing primary and secondary operations. These two essential pieces of
equipment are a projected investment of #####. Below is a list of operations
these two pieces are involved in through the manufacturing process at the CITY
plant.
The facility supports several test stands in their
laboratory areas. These stands are used in both research and development; as
well as quality assurance analysis. When performing various test procedures,
the chiller units aid by creating atmosphere variables on flying conditions to
ascertain data endurance on COMPANY components
that involve military and commercial aircraft. These lest stands simulate the
environmental conditions required by the Federal Aviation Commission prior to
certification of full component usage.
Quality assurance test stand procedures guarantee the
life cycle of the aircraft components by introducing variation temperature
conditions for fatigue performance as specified by the Federal Aviation
Commission, military and commercial sectors.
In the manufacturing environment, machining centers
must maintain balance temperature
conditions to control unnecessary heat build-up that
could fatigue both tools and parts during development. Potential weakness of
metal composition can jeopardize metal tensile strength that would render the
part as scrap.
The chiller units further aid and guarantee product
integrity by controlling impurities from inflicting mechanical defects that
would reduce performance capability.
Additionally, the expansion will include a SPECIFIC
DESCRIPTION.
We recently met with the INDIVIDUAL, deputy director
of the Department of Community and Economic Development, and INDIVIDUAL,
director of Business Development at the State office. They informed Parker of
the possibility of receiving the exemption of
sales and use of the purchase or lease of new equipment or machinery for
manufacturing facilities. It is for this reason that I am writing this letter.
COMPANY is
looking for additional clarification on this tax incentive and whether it can
be used on specific equipment, SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT. The CITY plant is doing the
preliminary development work on this expansion and is in need of this tax
information in order to make a prudent decision for obvious financial reasons.
I look forward to discussing this matter with you
further. I would be happy to come to Utah to meet regarding this situation in
order to determine what tax incentives are available for this particular
expansion. Please feel free to contact me at #####.
I wish to thank you in advance for your cooperation
and assistance regarding this project's development.
INDIVIDUAL
COMPANY
RESPONSE
LETTER
May 4, 1999
COMPANY
ADDRESS
RE: Utah=s Manufacturing Equipment Exemption and its
Application to Equipment Purchases at COMPANY CITY.
Dear NAME,
We have received your advisory opinion request
concerning the purchase of new equipment for your company=s facility located in CITY UTAH (FACILITY). You have asked if the contemplated purchase
of two new SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT would
qualify for a sales and use tax exemption for manufacturing equipment under
Utah Code. Ann. '59-12-104(14).
In addition, you have asked how this exemption would relate to possible
expansions in newly vacated floor space at the facility.
Equipment. Section 59-12-104(14) allows a sales and use
tax exemption on purchases of machinery and equipment with an economic life of
three or more years if used in the manufacturing process to manufacture an item
sold as tangible personal property and if used in a manufacturing facility in
Utah.
COMPANY SPECIFIC INFORMATION Thus, the CITY facility
is a Utah manufacturing facility and is designated as code 3728 in the 1987
Standard Industrial Classification (ASIC@) Manual. The
control systems are items sold as personal property. We will also assume that the chillers and boiler have an economic
life of three or more years. Still,
before the manufacturing equipment exemption would apply, we must determine
whether the chillers and boiler system are machinery and equipment used in the
manufacturing process.
MACHINE. The SPECIFIC INFORMATION at the CITY
facility must meet performance specifications dictated both by the customer and
the Federal Aviation Commission. These
specifications set forth guidelines as to how the system parts and the metal in
them must react to variations of heat and cold in simulated conditions. To test these systems and parts, the CITY
facility has a laboratory testing area where Atest stands@ simulate environmental conditions.
The MACHINE will serve several purposes at the CITY
facility. The primary purpose of the
MACHINE would be in the laboratory testing area to produce the cold
temperatures necessary to simulate variable temperature conditions in the test
stands. After the systems and parts
meet the required specifications in the simulated conditions, they can be
certified for use. While most of the
laboratory use of the MACHINE would be to ensure that the system parts meet
specifications, a portion of their use
(perhaps 10%) would be devoted purely to research and development carried forth
in the laboratory.
Another use of the MACHINE would be to provide a cool
environment for certain machines in the manufacturing process. The manufacturing facility itself is not air
conditioned. However, certain machines
in the manufacturing process (approximately 10 machines) require air
conditioning. The cool temperatures
control unnecessary heat build-up that could fatigue both tools and parts
associated with these machines.
Section (B) of Utah Admin. Code R865-19S-85 (ARule 85") provides that the manufacturing
equipment exemption does not apply to items of tangible personal property that
become part of the real property in which the manufacturing operation is
conducted. The nature of a cooling
system would suggest that it is attached to the real property in such a way
that it becomes part of the real property.
Aiding in this conclusion is the fact that cooling ducts are attached to
the chillers and transmit cooled air to different areas of the manufacturing
facility, including the various machines in the manufacturing facility. Accordingly, if the chillers are attached so
as to become real property, they would not qualify for the manufacturing
equipment exemption.
Even were the chillers considered separate from the
real property, section (C) of Rule 85 disqualifies machinery or equipment from
the exemption when that machinery or equipment is used for an activity that is
not part of the manufacturing process, unless that use is de minimis. ADe
minimis@ is defined in section (A) of the rule to mean that an
Aitem=s use in
nonqualifying activities is inconsequential in relation to the item=s use for qualifying activities.@
Approximately 10 % of the use of the chillers is to
cool areas of the manufacturing facility where machines need a controlled
temperature environment, while another 10% or so of the use is for research and
development. Neither of these uses,
totally about 20% of the chillers=
use, is a part of the manufacturing process to produce the aircraft control
systems. This is not an inconsequential
amount and, thus, does not qualify as de minimis use. Accordingly, the chillers are disqualified from the exemption
even without considering whether the primary use of the chillers (i.e.,
laboratory testing of the parts) is part of the manufacturing process.
Boiler System. The boiler system would serve two
purposes. First, it would be used in
the laboratory testing area in the same fashion as the chillers; i.e., to
simulate the temperature variations necessary to meet the required
specifications. Second, the boiler
system would be used to provide heating for the Ogden facility. The boiler system would be used
approximately 50% for each of these purposes.
The boiler system would not qualify for the
exemption. First, it is unlikely that
the system is not attached so as to become part of the real property. Second, its use to provide heating for the
CITY facility is a use that is not part of the manufacturing process. This alone is a nonqualifying activity that
would employ 50% of the boiler system=s
use. This nonmanufacturing use is not
an inconsequential use and, thus, does not meet the de minimis standard. Accordingly, the boiler system would not
qualify for the manufacturing equipment exemption.
Expansion. Approximately ##### square feet of space in
the manufacturing facility had been occupied by a cafeteria. That space has been vacated, and COMPANY is contemplating using the space as
manufacturing floor space. You have
asked how the manufacturing equipment exemption might apply if the space is
converted to use as manufacturing space.
There is no exemption that applies to the costs
incurred in converting nonmanufacturing floor space into manufacturing floor
space. Nevertheless, COMPANY would be eligible for the manufacturing
equipment exemption for any qualifying purchases of machinery and equipment
that will occupy that floor space. The
requirements for the manufacturing equipment exemption have been explained above. Please note, however, that as of July 1,
1998, the 100% exemption applies not only to machinery and equipment used in
new or expanding operations but also to machinery and equipment that are normal
operating replacements.
Please contact us if you have any other questions.
For the Commission,
R. Bruce Johnson
Commissioner
^^