98-078
Response January 6, 1999
REQUEST LETTER
October 3, 1998
RE: Request
for clarification on determining exempt function income and qualifying
expenditures when filing an 1120-H Income Tax Return.
Dear Ms Rees.
INTRODUCTION:
This letter is to request clarification regarding the
Utah State Tax Commission's interpretation of the guidelines of determining 60%
exempt function income and 90% qualifying expenditures for when filing a 1120H
Income Tax Return, particularly considering returns filed by OWNERS Property Owners Association located in
COUNTY, Utah.
FACTS:
In 1992 the Association reinstituted assessing dues 10
the owners or lots located in LOCATION Plats A & B. The following table
sets forth file percentage or Expenses as compared to Total Income:
1992 |
1993 |
1994 |
1995 |
1996 |
1997 |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
By July 998, a total or over $$$$$ had been shown on
balance sheets hr total income of which only 50% had been disbursed for
expenses, the balance has been retained Maximum interest income has been 10%.
additional income not directly related to assessments is minimal. (Tax returns for the association in 1994,
1995 and 1997 were filed on Form 1120H.)
Without a budget being set forth for the Trustees or the membership to
approve, the Treasurer once again sent out Assessments in 1998. The excess
retention of assessments was explained as Arainy
day fund,.but no documentation(such as
for IRS Section 118, or for a sinking find) as to the purpose for the retention
of these finds has ever been presented or documented in Member or Trustee
minutes. The association has NO fee simple common area to maintain.
QUERY
As Corporate Secretary for the Association. I am
responsible for assisting in compliance with State Law, and need the Tax
Commissions=s assistance to clarify my understanding of this
situation. My research of file State of Utah Corporate Franchise and Income Tax
Code indicates that it relies upon Internal Revenue Codes for guidance in
filing 1120H Income Tax. Returns
1. Is it
allowable to assess for dues and retain excess assessments without claiming
said dues as income when here is no documentation as 0 the purpose of those
assessments or when the fluids will be disbursed'? (IRS Section 45(})
2 Is the
60% test for exempt function income satisfied only by the action of assessment,
regardless of the purposes or lack thereof for those assessments? (IRS Section 528)
3 Is the
90% expenses test met by the disbursement of funds for qualified expenses
regardless of the retention of excess assessments during flat tax year? (IRS
Section 528)
Your assistance in clarification of these matters is
greatly appreciated. If you have any questions herewith please feel free to
contact me at #####.
Sincerely
Enclosures
RESPONSE
LETTER
January 6, 1999
RE: Advisory
Opinion - Utah Corporate Franchise Taxation of Homeowner Associations
Dear NAME,
We have received your request for interpretation of
several sections of the Internal Revenue Code (AIRC@) as they pertain to the OWNERS ASSOCIATION (AAssociation@). You have stated in your letter that the Utah
Corporate Franchise and Income Tax Act relies upon the IRC, which is true. Because of Utah=s reliance on the IRC, you have asked us how to
properly complete the federal 1120H income tax return for your Association.
Section 59-7-102(1)(b) of the Utah Code provides that
a homeowner association is exempt from Utah corporate franchise taxation if
that association is recognized as exempt by the Internal Revenue Service (AIRS@) and has no
federal taxable income under Section 528 of the IRC. We currently have records that show that the IRS deemed the
Association to be exempt in 1990. Unfortunately,
we are not in a position to establish federal income tax exemptions or
establish your Association=s taxable
income for federal tax purposes. That
jurisdiction lies not with us, but with the Internal Revenue Service (AIRS@). Accordingly, for interpretations of the IRC,
we suggest you contact the IRS to receive the proper guidance you request.
We can, however, offer you guidance as to your Utah
state tax obligations. If the IRS
determines that your Association has no taxable income for federal tax
purposes, then under Utah law, you will have no taxable income for Utah tax
purposes. In this circumstance, the
Association need not file any Utah state tax return. However, should the IRS determine that the Association does have
taxable income for federal tax purposes, then this income is also taxable
income for Utah tax purposes. In this
circumstance, you would need to report this taxable income on Utah=s TC20HA tax return.
Please contact us if you have any other questions.
For the Commission,
Joe B. Pacheco, CPA
Commissioner
^^