98-037

Response May 26, 1998

 

 

REQUEST LETTER

 

March 5, 1998

 

Dear Irene Rees:

 

I am writing to your office in hopes that there may be some consideration to restore in some way the Disability Exemption which for 1997 was abolished.

 

My wife is totally disabled and totally dependent upon me for everything. She cannot feed herself or go to the toilet or c1ean herself or move herself and is totally bed bound. Question? Why cannot my wife qualify for this exemption any more. What makes a sibling more dependent than my wife?

 

My wife is afflicted with Multiple Sclerosis and will remain so till she dies as there is no cure. Is it the State Legislatures greed for funds? They have ATTACKED the most helpless of individuals, those who cannot defend themselves. In essence they have attacked themselves also. There will be several among them who abolished this exemption that will either be afflicted themselves (and deservedly so) or their spouse will be afflicted. Not many brains or morals.

 

Is a state so great that hosts an Olympics and yet not look to the welfare of helpless people and give them a small economic break? The exemption law I am sure will hurt some people more than myself who may not be as well off.

 

I write to you from a moral duty to others. You yourself must advise some kind of a modification based upon economic need and income. This would be fair. You may do as you wish. It is a Just and Almighty God that sees the vote of everyone who wields public trust and authority. Utah has shamed itself and hurt some people significantly. For me it is only about $$$$$, this is a blow to some poor people who have very little.

 

I will close for now, the Utah legislature should be nominated for a Mother Teresa Award of some kind, for a last place finish.

 

Sincerely,

 

NAME

 

RESPONSE LETTER

 

May 26, 1998

 

NAME

ADDRESS

CITY, STATE ZIP

 

RE: Advisory Opinion - Disability Exemption for State Income Taxes

 

Dear NAME,

 

We have received your request for an advisory opinion concerning the disability exemption for state income taxes that is found in Utah Code Ann. §59-10-114(2)(f). You have expressed genuine concern that this exemption was abolished in 1997 as it relates to your wife, who is totally disabled. Please allow us to first explain the exemption and the role of the Tax Commission in administering it. Then, we can offer you a possible route through which to seek a change in its application.

 

Section 59-10-114(2)(f) allows as a deduction from taxable income “75% of the amount of the personal exemption, as defined and calculated in the Internal Revenue Code, for each dependent child with a disability and adult with a disability who is claimed as a dependent on a taxpayer's return.” The key word in this section is “dependent.” According to Internal Revenue Service guidelines, a spouse is never considered a dependent for income tax purposes. A spouse receives a personal exemption on the your tax return, but not a dependency exemption. The Utah disability exemption is specific in only applying to dependents; thus, it does not extend to a spouse.

 

Because your wife is disabled and the exemption is a disability exemption, it is understandable that you may have thought the exemption applied to your wife in the past. However, the application of the disability exemption under Utah law has not changed for many years. While the Tax Commission does audit a certain number of returns each year to discover errors, you may have claimed the disability exemption in the past without us discovering the error. Should this have occurred, we regret not finding the error earlier to avoid the misunderstanding it has caused you.

 

As the Tax Commission only administers the laws that are passed by the Legislature, we do not have the authority to apply the disability exemption, as it is currently written, to all persons who are disabled. However, your state senator and representative do have the authority to propose changes to laws for the Legislature to consider. Should you wish to contact them to pursue a change in the law, we have provided their names and mailing addresses below.

 

Senator Nathan Tanner Representative Blake D. Chard

6225 Woodland Drive 1940 N. 350 W.

Ogden, UT 84403 Layton, UT 84041

 

Please contact us if you have any other questions.

 

For the Commission,

Joe B. Pacheco

Commissioner

^^