98-012

Response February 6, 1998

 

 

 

REQUEST LETTER

 

January 23, 1998

 

Dear Ms Reese,

 

As per our phone conversation today, I have attached a copy of the work description for COMPANY A. They would like to have a written determination on whether the work they perform is subject to Utah State sales tax.

 

Please contact NAME at ##### if you have any questions. Thank you for your consideration.

 

Sincerely,

 

NAME

 

RESPONSE LETTER

 

February 6, 1998

 

NAME

ADDRESS

CITY, STATE ZIP

 

RE: Sales tax liability for services performed on nuclear medical equipment

 

Dear NAME,

 

We have received your request asking if sales tax liability is incurred by COMPANY A (“COMPANY A”), for services it performs on equipment that has been installed in hospitals. In the memorandum forwarded to us from NAME, you describe these services as “work on nuclear medicine equipment.” While the specific nature of this work is not described, we will assume that the services provided are either for repairs or renovation.

 

Utah Code Ann. §59-12-103(1)(g) imposes sales tax on services for repairs or renovations of tangible personal property. Utah Administrative Code R865-19S-78(B)(2) further provides that charges for labor to service, repair, or renovate equipment that is attached to real property so as to be considered real property are not subject to sales tax. To be considered part of the real property, the equipment must be permanently attached. Thus, if the nuclear medicine equipment is considered permanently attached to the real property, sales tax is not due on repair or renovation services provided by COMPANY A.

 

What constitutes permanent attachment? Rule 865-19S-78(B)(2) also provides that mere physical attachment is not enough to indicate permanent attachment. Instead, the attachment must be essential to the operation and use of the equipment, with the manner of the attachment suggesting that the equipment will remain affixed in the same place over its useful life. In addition, one may conclude that permanent attachment exists if removal of the equipment would cause it substantial damage or require substantial alteration or repair of the structure to which it is affixed.

 

From the memorandum you provided, we learn that the nuclear medicine equipment at issue is anchored to a specially-poured, self-leveling pad in the hospital and weighs between 3500 pounds and 8000 pounds. While the rule states that mere physical attachment does not by itself indicate permanent attachment, it does appear that tearing out the specially-poured floor pads at the hospital would require substantial alteration of or repair to the hospital should the equipment be removed. The weight of the equipment and the nature of its use, along with its being anchored in place, would all suggest that it will remain in the hospital over its useful life. As the equipment would appear to satisfy the permanent attachment criteria, repair or renovation services performed on it would not be taxable because it is now considered part of the real property.

 

Please contact us if you have any other questions.

 

For the Commission,

Joe B. Pacheco,

Commissioner

^^