97-046

Response August 6, 1997

 

 

REQUEST LETTER

 

We are asking for an advisory opinion to clarify the definition of a recycler.

 

Businesses calling themselves recyclers in the state of Utah are currently bringing scrap paper into their facilities, sorting it by grade, baling the different grades and shipping it out of state to end use mills. The mills then pulp tile material in place of wood chips and use the pulp to create a new product. There are no “end use" mills in the state of Utah and we do not believe there ever will be due to the large amount of water required to sustain the processes of a paper mill. The smallest facility our customers ship to consumes 3 million gallons of water per day.

 

We are a brokerage company that handles transportation and delivery arrangements of scrap paper to end use mills. We have set many companies up on recycling programs which are unique to this market. The companies we work with handle the sorting and baling of their material for direct shipment to an end use paper mill. Since these customers are handling the preparation of their scrap paper in the same way that a recycling center does, we feel tile equipment they are using should fall under the recycling exemption whether they are a grocery store, warehouse, manufacturer, etc.

 

In the past year our customers have shipped for the purpose of recycling over 5O,OOO,OOO lbs. of scrap paper that otherwise would have gone into Utah landfills. As per your definition in the tax bulletin these businesses are at a fixed location, utilizing machinery or equipment to process paper into prepared grades of processed materials for use in new products that would otherwise be made with nonrecycled materials. In consideration of these facts, we feel anyone who purchases a piece of equipment for tile sole purpose of recycling deserves to fall under the definition of a scrap recycler.

 

 

RESPONSE LETTER

 

 

August 6, 1997

 

NAME

ADDRESS

CITY STATE ZIP

 

 

Advisory Opinion - Application of manufacturing sales tax exemption to businesses that purchase equipment to bale paper products for shipping to a recycler.

 

Dear NAME,

 

We have received your request for sales tax guidance pertaining to the manufacturing exemption. From your letter and telephone conversations with our staff, you have indicated that your client sells baling equipment to businesses (such as grocery and other retail stores) for their use in sorting and bundling cardboard and paper products for shipment to a recycler. As to sales by your client of this type of equipment to retailers, we find as follows:

 

Senate Bill 29 sets out the definition of recycler as one who, from a fixed location, utilizes machinery or equipment to process qualifying items into prepared grades of processed materials for use in new products. We interpret that language to mean that a recycler is one who uses some process or treatment and actually changes the character or nature of the item into a form that can be used as a raw material in a new product. A retailer or other business operator who merely sorts and bundles cardboard or other paper products for shipment to a recycler is not a recycler within the meaning of this exemption.

 

You have indicated that no paper recyclers operate in Utah. Therefore, if the statute is read narrowly, the exemption has no application to paper recyclers. Tax exemptions are sometimes intentionally written broadly to encompass all activities of a similar nature. Even if there are no paper recyclers in Utah today, the exemption is broad enough to apply to any paper recycler who locates in Utah in the future. If the wording of the statute continues to cause you concern, we urge you to address your issue to the state legislature. At this point we are bound by the plain wording of the statute.

 

Thank you for bringing this matter to our attention. If you have other questions, please contact us again.

 

For the Commission,

Joe B. Pacheco,

Commissioner