97-038

Response June 26, 1997

 

 

 

REQUEST LETTER

 

May 20, 1997

 

Dear Director:

 

I am writing to you on behalf of a client who is planning on establishing a chain of retail stores in the State of Utah and seeks tax guidance. My client is a mail order company, operating out of California, whose only business activity in Utah in the past has been with residents who order merchandise by mail order from the company's California facility. Although it is our position that these interstate activities are protected under the Commerce Clause pursuant to National Bellas Hess v. Department of Revenue, 386 US 753 (1987) , we acknowledge that operating retail locations within the State of Utah will establish the firm's nexus within Utah. My client, who prefers to remain anonymous initially due to the sensitivity of this issue, has asked me to contact you on its behalf, and to obtain a ruling on the effect, if any, that the establishment of a chain of retail stores in Utah will have on the taxability of its mail order sales in Utah.

 

On 16 May, 1997, a representative of my client spoke anonymously with NAME of your Technical Research Department. It was NAME's preliminary opinion, based upon the facts set forth below, that although any retail activities would require the collection of Utah sales tax, my client's mail order sales in Utah will remain exempt. The following facts regarding my client's operations ("Company") were verbally conveyed to NAME, and are hereby presented for your review at his suggestion:

 

12) The Company, a California Corporation engaged in mail order and retail sales, wishes to expand its chain of retail stores into the state of Utah.

 

2) The Company has not previously had any physical presence in the State of Utah, and it has engaged in business with Utah residents solely through mail order operations.

 

3) The Company will duly register with the State of Utah's Division of Corporations, and will obtain any state, county, and local licenses necessary to both register the Company, and to engage in the business of retail sales.

 

4) The Company operates separate divisions for its retail and mail order activities. The mail order division will continue to operate independently of any retail locations in the State of Utah. Orders from Utah residents to the Company's mail order division are taken, processed, and shipped from outside Utah.

 

5) The Company does not allow any mail order activity, including, but not limited to, placing orders, accepting returns, or distributing catalogs to be conducted from its retail locations.

 

6) Although the Company's retail division will establish nexus in Utah by virtue of the presence of its facilities, employees, and inventory, the mail order division will continue to maintain its merchandise, employees, and facilities outside the state of Utah.

 

7) The Company recognizes its responsibility to collect Utah sales tax on its retail operations and will do so according to the laws and regulations of the State.

 

8) It is the Company's desire to comply with all of the State's requirements as expeditiously as possible, so that it may proceed with its retail expansion plans.

 

Should you require any further information in order to issue a written ruling as to whether or not the Company's mail order division will be required to collect taxes on sales to Utah residents under the above circumstances, please do not hesitate to contact me. Upon receipt of a written ruling on this issue, I will contact my client with your determination. When my client is prepared to begin operating in Utah, its representatives will contact you directly. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

NAME

 

 

RESPONSE LETTER

 

 

June 26, 2997

 

 

NAME

ADDRESS

CITY STATE ZIP

 

Advisory Opinion - Sales tax nexus

 

Dear NAME,

 

We have received your request for sales tax guidance as to whether operating retail stores in Utah creates nexus for the company’s mail order business. The answer is “yes.”

 

Under Utah law, a vendor is required to collect and remit sales or use tax on its taxable Utah transactions if the vendor has an office, warehouse, salesperson, or other physical presence in Utah. Utah Code Section 59-12-107 (5) states, in pertinent part:

 

(1) (a) Each vendor shall pay or collect and remit the sales and use taxes imposed by this chapter if within this state the vendor:

(I) has or utilizes an office, distribution house, sales house, warehouse, service enterprise, or other place of business;

(ii) maintains a stock of goods;

. . .

(iv) regularly engages in the delivery of property in this state other than by common carrier or United States mail; or

(v) regularly engages in any activity in connection with the leasing or servicing of property located within this state.

 

If your client establishes retail stores in Utah, it will have nexus for all of its sales in Utah -- including mail order sales conducted by another division of the same company.

 

Thank you for putting your request for tax guidance in writing. Documentation of your question and our response may be helpful to you if this issue comes up again in the future. Please let us know if you have other questions.

 

For the Commission,

Joe B. Pacheco,

Commissioner