96-158

Response October 28, 1996

 

 

Request

XXXXX

 

September 30, 1996

 

XXXXX

Utah State Tax Commission

210 N 1950 W

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Subject: Utah State Tax Commission's ruling on Internal Revenue Code, Section 62(c), Accountable Plan (documentation attached) in Reference to a Use or Sales Tax on the Rental of Tangible Personal Property

 

Dear XXXXX

 

I am writing to you to get the Utah State Tax Commission's written determination on Internal Revenue Code Section 62(c), Accountable Plan. Normally, as I understand it, when someone rents or leases their personal tangible property there is a State use or sales tax. In the Other Expense Allowance Arrangement (paper trail) under IRC Section 62(c) an employee who holds his own tools, retains title to the tools, retains possession of his/her tools, sets up an “accountable plan” (tool rental program) with their employer. This Other Expense Allowance Arrangement (IRC Sect. 62(c) “Accountable Plan”), similar in some ways to a Leaseback arrangement, allows the employee to rent their tools to their employer or agent for the employer.

 

The employee under this arrangement does not pay FICA, MEDICARE on this portion of their income. This provides some FICA/Medicare tax relief for those employees who own their own tools. This arrangement never exceeds 35% of their wages. The employer or employee are not making a profit from this arrangement. The employee realizes a modest net income increase to help offset the cost of owning and purchasing tools and equipment as an employee. Obviously, any additional tools purchased from the realized savings are subject to sales tax.

 

This arrangement does not change an employee's federal or state income tax liability. The average savings realized by an employee is approximately 7 1/2% on the portion of income that falls under an accountable plan. If the state charges a use tax under this arrangement an employee would not be able to participate. This program is a “paper” arrangement that has specific guidelines. I am faxing two IRS letters that should give you good insight to the program. Thank you for your time and courteous attention on this matter.

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX

 

 

October 28, 1996

 

XXXXX

 

Advisory Opinion - Application of sales tax to use of tools or equipment owned by the operator.

 

Dear XXXXX

 

We have received your request for tax advice pertaining to situations in which a person is hired to provide some type of work or service using the worker’s own equipment. As your letter and the accompanying documentation indicate, in the income tax area it is important to deter mine which part of the payment is allocated to the worker’s wages. However, with regard to sales tax, we offer the following advice:

 

If the contract or arrangement in question calls for the worker to perform a service and to provide the tools or equipment used to perform the service, the use of the tools or equipment is not a separate transaction. The total charge is either taxable or non-taxable, depending upon whether the service itself is taxable. For instance, if the work entails the repair of tangible personal property, the entire amount charged for repair service is taxable. The fact that the repairman uses his own tools has no impact on that outcome. On the other hand, if the worker is hired to install permanent landscaping, the installation is not taxable, even if the worker provides the backhoe used in the process. By contrast if the contract or arrangement calls for you or your client to deliver tools or equipment to a job for use or operation by a customer, the transaction is deemed as taxable equipment rental.

 

Because your request contains no particular details of the type of tools or work involved, we cannot offer an opinion as to whether your transactions are taxable or non-taxable. If you need more explicit direction, please provide us with additional details.

 

For the Commission,

 

Joe B. Pacheco,

Commissioner