96-114

Response July 25, 1996

 

 

Request

June 20, 1996

 

Roger O. Tew

State Tax Commission

Heber M. Wells Bldg.

160 E. 300 South

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Dear Mr. Tew:

 

XXXXX is a nationwide lessor of motor vehicles with its headquarters located in XXXXX, Illinois. In contemplation of restructuring one of its leasing operations (Company A) we are requesting written confirmation/letter ruling concerning the taxability for Utah sales and use tax purposes of the proposed structure described herein.

 

FACTS

 

Current Structure

 

Company A currently provides motor vehicle lease financing in Utah. The typical transaction is structured as follows:

 

* A motor vehicle dealer (“Dealer”) submits a credit application for a prospective lessee to Company A to determine whether Company A will purchase a lease entered into between the Dealer (as initial lessor) and the prospective lessee;

 

* Company A approves the credit, a lease (the “Lease”) is executed between the Dealer, as lessor, and the applicant, as lessee;

 

* Any sales/use tax due on lease down payments and first month’s rent are collected and remitted to State by the Dealer who is the initial lessor and the State’s fiduciary for purposes of collecting and remitting the tax;

 

* Company A acquires the Lease and the related leased vehicle (the “Leased Vehicle”) from the Dealer and the applicable sales and use taxes are paid or the proper resale certificates are given by Company A in connection with the acquisition of the Leased Vehicle and Lease. Further, the certificate of title to and registration of the vehicle are issued in the name of Company A to evidence its legal ownership of such leased vehicle; and

 

* Company A (as assignee of the Lease) becomes the lessor of the Leased Vehicle. From this point forward, Company A collects and remits the applicable sales and use tax from the lessee to the state.

 

The volume of motor vehicle leasing has increased tremendously, both nationwide and in Utah. Due to restrictions imposed by titling and registration laws on the ability of a finance company (such as Company A) to access funding sources, this business has resulted in certain inefficiencies and increased cost to consumers. Company A would like to change its typical transaction structure as described below.

 

Proposed Structure

 

Company A plans to use a titling trust structure for titling and registering Leased Vehicles. The essential elements of the structure are as follows:

 

* Company A will create a trust (“XXXXX”) that will obtain all applicable licences in Utah. The activities of the XXXXX will primarily be limited to acquiring and serving as record holder of legal title to Leased Vehicles and the Leases;

 

* the certificates of title to the Leased Vehicles will be issued in the name of the XXXXX or in the name of the trustee for the XXXXX (the “Trustee”) and the XXXXX (as assignee of the Leases) will become the lessor under the leases. The primary assets of the XXXXX will consist of (I) the Leased Vehicles; (ii) the Leases and (iii) proceeds of the foregoing; and

 

* the applicable sales and use taxes will be paid or proper resale certificates will be given by the XXXXX (or Trustee, if applicable).

 

The XXXXX structure is essentially the same as the current structure described above except that the Trust, instead of Company A, will acquire the Leased Vehicle and the Leases. The implementation of this structure will not adversely effect, or otherwise have any impact on, lessees who will continue to maintain possession of the Leased Vehicles.

 

As provided above, the Leased Vehicles will be owned by the XXXXX (through the XXXXX of the Trustee being named as owner on the certificates of title) and Company A will own 100 percent of the beneficial interest in the Leased Vehicles or the Leases but instead will be entitled to receive the cash proceeds generated from the XXXXX assets. Lessees will not be affected by the new titling and registration procedures. Company A (or its subservicer) will be the Servicer for the Trust and continue to provide lease related services to the lessees. A diagram of the XXXXX is illustrated in Exhibit A.

 

Company A may from time to time transfer all or a portion of its beneficial interest in the XXXXX. Such transfers are intended to facilitate for financing by Company A of its motor vehicle leasing business and can take the form of a pledge or sale to one or more third parties (each, a “Transferee”). A diagram of these transfers is illustrated in Exhibit B.

 

We believe that none of these transfers of beneficial interests requires retitling or reregistration because legal title to the Leased Vehicles and the Leases will continue to be vested in and held by the XXXXX. Because legal title to the Leased Vehicles never changes, no retitling or registration is required.

 

Similarly, the Transferees will be able to sell or pledge their beneficial interest in the XXXXX assets without retitling or reregistering the Leased Vehicles. However, legal title to the Leased Vehicles remain with the XXXXX and possession of the leased Vehicles will remain with the lessees even though the beneficial interest may be transferred.

 

Adoption of the XXXXX structure will help Company A contain costs and allow it to continue to provide competitive financing to motor vehicle lessees.

 

Issues

 

1. Whether the Utah sales and use tax will be imposed on the XXXXX’s acquisition of title to the Leased Vehicles and the Leases from the Dealers if the XXXXX (or the Trustee) is properly registered for sales and use tax purposes with the State of Utah? Is the Trust or the Trustee to be considered the state’s fiduciary who must be registered for Utah sales and use tax purposes?

 

2. Whether the gross receipts received by Company A from the transfer of beneficial interests in the XXXXX are subject to the Utah sales and use tax?

 

3. Whether the gross receipts received by the transferees from subsequent transfers of the beneficial interests in the XXXXX are subject to the Utah sales and use tax?

 

Law

 

The Utah sales and use tax is a general sales tax applicable to all retail sales of tangible personal property that are not specifically excluded or exempted and specified services1. Leases and rentals of tangible personal property are considered taxable sales2. Motor vehicles are tangible personal property and the lease of which is subject to sales or use tax3. Lessors must compute sales or use tax on amounts received or charged pursuant to the rental or lease agreement4.

 

Use tax is an excise tax imposed on the storage, use, or other consumption of tangible personal property in Utah on which no sales tax was paid5.

 

For purposes of the sales tax, “retail sale” means any sale within the state of tangible personal property or any other taxable item or service other than a resale of such property, item or service6. “Tangible personal property” subject to sales tax is defined as all goods, wares, merchandise, produce and commodities, and all physically existing articles” 7. Taxable services do not include those of a financial nature8. Therefore, sales of intangible property are not subject to sales or use tax. The sales and use tax is not imposed on financial transactions.

 

A “retailer” is a person engaged in a regularly organized retail business selling tangible personal property on any taxable item or service to the user or consumer, and not for resale9. For sales and use tax purposes, “person” includes a “trust” 10. Under the Sales and Use Tax Act, any person required to collect the sales or use tax must obtain a licence by filing an application with the Tax Commission before engaging in business11.

 

Analysis

 

Sales or use tax will not be imposed upon the transfer of title to the Leased Vehicles and the Leases from the Dealers to XXXXX because the transaction is exempt as a sale for resale. XXXXX, as lessor of the leased vehicles, will be allowed to purchase the property as tax exempt. However, sales tax will be imposed upon the gross receipts that Company A collects from the Lessees on behalf of XXXXX.

 

Sales or use tax will not be imposed upon the gross receipts received by Company A from the transfer of beneficial interests in the XXXXX to the Transferees. The beneficial interests issued by XXXXX are intangible property because the do not fit in the Utah definition of tangible property. Intangible property is not subject to the Utah sales and use tax. Therefore, the transfer of beneficial interests does not constitute a sale at retail subject to tax. Similarly, the gross receipts received by the Transferees from their transfers of the beneficial interests in XXXXX are not subject to the Utah sales and use tax. Furthermore, the proposed structure is being undertaken to improve the efficiency of financing the Leased Vehicles. Therefore, it constitutes a financing transaction under Utah law, and, as such, is exempt from sales tax.

 

As stated above, the requirement to obtain a licence is imposed on persons who make retail transactions. The XXXXX as lessor of vehicles is a person who may be deemed to be making retail transactions. Therefore, XXXXX must obtain a licence. While Company A (or its Subservicer)collects the sales and use tax from lessees it is not a person required to collect sales and use tax. Company A (or its subservicer) is merely the lease servicing agent for XXXXX.

 

Conclusion Requested

 

For the reasons stared above, we respectfully request the issuance of a ruling that the transfer of title in the Leased Vehicles and related Leases from the Dealer to XXXXX or the Trustee are tax-exempt sales for resale. The transfer of beneficial interests in the XXXXX from Company A to the Transferees and the subsequent transfer of beneficial interests from the XXXXX by the Transferees are not subject to Utah sales and use tax since they would be sales in intangibles or considered financing transactions. XXXXX will obtain a registered retail merchant’s certificate. We further request that Company A (or its subservicer), as the servicing agent for XXXXX will be allowed to remit sales or use tax directly to the State of Utah, on behalf of XXXXX.

 

We would appreciate written confirmation of this conclusion. Accordingly, please sign this letter evidencing your agreement with this conclusion on the line designated below.

 

Thank you for your time and consideration of this matter. If you have any questions, please call me at XXXXX.

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX

Enclosures: XXXXX Diagram

 

 

July 25, 1996

 

XXXXX

 

Advisory Opinion - Sales tax on automobile leases and subsequent transfer of leases.

 

Dear XXXXX

 

We have received your request for sales tax information pertaining to automobile leases and the ramifications of subsequent transfers of the leases. We find as follows:

 

A vehicle may be acquired tax free by the lessor under the resale exemption set out in section 59-12-104 (26) Utah Code Ann. However, the lessor is required to collect sales tax on each lease payment and report and remit the tax to the Tax Commission. If the lease and ownership of the vehicle is subsequently transferred to another lessor, that transfer is also exempt under the resale exemption. It is the responsibility of the new lessor to collect and remit sales tax on the lease payments.

 

Under the lease arrangement that you propose, if Company A acquires the vehicle from the dealer the transaction is tax free under the resale exemption. If Company A then transfers the lease and ownership of the vehicle to the “XXXXX,” that transfer is also exempt under the resale exemption. Alternatively, the “XXXXX” itself may acquire the vehicle from the dealer tax free. In either case, the trust is responsible for collecting and remitting sales tax on the lease payments. The transaction between the trust and Company A, in which proceeds from the lease are transferred from the trust to Company A is not subject to sales tax.

 

For the Commission,

 

Alice Shearer,

Commissioner