96-091

Response May 17, 1996

 

 

Request

This opinion arises out of an appeal decision on appeal number 95-1542. The appeal addressed and penalty and interest issue, and advised the petitioner that the Commission would issue an advisory opinion as to the taxability of income earned from XXXXX.

 

DOCUMENT OFFERED IN SUPPORT OF APPEAL

 

November 20, 1995

 

Appeals Division

Utah State Tax Commission

210 North 1950 West

Salt lake City, Utah 84134

 

RE: Income Tax, Account # XXXXX

 

Dear Sir/Madam:

 

This is to request a redetermination of your ruling as contained in your letter dated XXXXX, a copy of which is herewith attached.

 

For sometime, I have an uneasy feeling about the tax liability assessed by IRS, Utah State, and XXXXX Government. I believe that I have located the real issue in the case.

 

My major income has been paid by a source in XXXXX. XXXXX government treats all foreign consultant equally by skimming off the first 20% of the payment. This money taken by XXXXX government I have no chance of claiming them back, unless I live in XXXXX long enough to file tax returns there. I only receive the balance of the 80% monthly via wire transfer to my bank account in Utah. To me, this 80% is my gross income. The only reason I declare the other 20% in IRS return is the fact that IRS allow me to come back at the end of the form to claim some tax credit.

 

For the Utah return, I have to start out my 80% + the above-mentioned 20% on line 4 as the Federal adjusted gross income (copied from IRS return.) But State return does not give me a chance to make any equitable adjustment for the 20% money I never received, and had no access to claim refund. My contention is that the 20% skimmed off the top should be treated as cost of doing business in XXXXX and be allowed in the equitable adjustment. Or allow me to report the 80% as the entry in line 4 of the Utah return. Otherwise, the 20% money is literally taxed three times, first taken away by XXXXX, second by IRS for only giving me partial credit, third by Utah for assessing a 7% on the 20%. I do not believe that any body should be punished this way for earning their living from a foreign source.

 

Please allow me a hearing to clarify the case before the commission. Thank you for your consideration.

 

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX

 

 

May 17, 1996

 

XXXXX

 

Advisory Opinion - Tax on income earned in foreign countries.

 

Dear XXXXX

 

As stated in our decision and order on your appeal (appeal number 95-1542), we are issuing you this advisory opinion pertaining to the taxability of the income that you earn in XXXXX.

 

All income earned by a taxpayer who is a resident of Utah is taxable in Utah regardless of the source of income. As a resident, you must report all of your income, including income derived from sources in XXXXX. Although you are entitled to a credit for taxes paid to another state or possession of the United States, Utah law allows no credit for taxes paid to foreign countries. This outcome may seem harsh, but we have no authority to grant an exemption. This is an issue that you may wish to address with the legislature.

 

Please let us know if you have other questions.

 

For the Commission,

 

Alice Shearer,

Commissioner