95-050

Responses January 26, 1995 and August 29, 1995

 

 

Request

November 16, 1994

 

XXXXX, Sales Tax Auditor

Utah State Tax Commission

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

I am writing to you regarding a question involving interpretation of a provision of Tax Bulletin 31-94. This Bulletin covers payment of sales tax by governmental entities on “construction materials.” Construction materials are defined in the bulletin as “any tangible personal property that will be converted into real property.”

 

My question arises from a situation in which XXXXX is participating in construction of a booster pumping facility and storage tank facility. The construction contract required the City to furnish certain materials, including pumps, building mechanical piping, flow meter, and telemetry equipment, which were to be installed by the contractor. My interpretation of the bulletin would be that the pumps, the meter and the telemetry would be classed as equipment and remains as tangible, not real, property and therefore not subject to sales tax. The mechanical piping, on the other hand, might be considered to be converted to real property, although most of it is not part of the structure and could be easily removed.

 

Please advise me in writing whether I have correctly interpreted the rule. If you have any questions or need additional explanation, please call me at XXXXX.

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX

 

 

January 26, 1995

 

XXXXX

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

In response to your letter of XXXXX (copy attached), I am providing you with the following information.

 

I agree with your interpretation of Tax Bulletin 31-94 as it relates to the pumps, meter and telemetry. The items would appear to be ones which remain tangible personal property after installation. Any portion of the piping that does not become part of the real property structure, could be easily removed without damaging the piping itself or the structure, and which connects the equipment items together would similarly be expected to remain personal property, not “construction materials.”

 

Respectfully,

 

XXXXX

Sales and Use Tax

Auditing Division

 

 

July 27, 1995

 

XXXXX

Sales & Use Tax Auditing Division

210 No 1900 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84124

 

Re: Tax Bulletin 31-94

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

XXXXX, sells centrifugal pumps, both horizontal & vertical primarily for water supply and distributions purposes together with parts for the same. All of the pumps sold and designed are readily removable for either moving to another site or for repairs

 

You issued a letter dated XXXXX (copy enclosed) to XXXXX City Water Department which says that these type of pumps "remain tangible personal property after installation", and accordingly are exempt for sales tax collection if sold to a municipality.

 

We need to know if this opinion can be applied by our client's globally to all municipalities, assuming proper documentation is secured? There appears to be some confusion with some suppliers and customers.

 

If you would like to discuss the matter please call me.

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX

 

 

August 29, 1995

 

XXXXX

 

RE: Advisory Opinion - Application of sales tax to centrifugal pumps sold to government entities for public water distribution systems.

 

Dear XXXXX,

 

Under section 59-12-104 of the Utah Code, sales of tangible personal property to the state and its political subdivisions are exempt from sales tax. However, sales of construction materials to the state or other government entities are taxable unless the materials are installed or converted to real property by the government entity's employees. The exemption applies to all municipal entities. However, the question of whether sales of your client's pumps are taxable depends upon whether they are classified as personal property or construction materials. Without knowing the specific details of each particular sale, we can only offer you the following general guidelines:

 

Pumps, metering equipment and telemetry equipment are generally deemed to retain their character as personal property after installation on real property. The mechanical piping poses a more difficult question. We would tend to look at the manner in which it is installed in the building and the purpose that it serves. For instance, if the piping is essential to the use and enjoyment of the building, it may be viewed as real property. For instance, the plumbing installed in a residence is considered part of the realty. On the other hand, if the plumbing serves only the pumping equipment, we may view it as personal property.

 

As you can see, these determinations tend to be very fact-specific. If your client needs help in making these determinations under a particular contract, please contact us for help.

 

For the Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner