95-034

Response July 28, 1995

 

 

Request

June 19, 1995

 

Utah State Tax Commission

Attn: XXXXX

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Dear Representative,

 

The purpose of this letter is to request a ruling from the Utah Department of Revenue concerning the taxability of supply and other non-resale items purchased for our own consumption. These items are purchased and warehoused in our own distribution centers located outside of Utah. As a retailer of automotive parts and accessories in 25 states, it is imperative that we clarify the use tax implications concerning shipments of these items from the distribution centers to our retail outlets in your state. Our questions are as follows:

 

1. If our distribution center is located in a state which mandates that sales tax be paid when title passes, does Utah assess additional use tax when these items are shipped from this distribution center to retail outlets located in your state? If so, please explain how we can avoid double taxation (i.e., are we only assessed on the difference in rates?).

 

2. If our distribution center is not located in a state such as that referred to in question #1 above, but XXXXX elects to remit sales tax, does Utah assess additional use tax when these items are shipped from this distribution center to retail outlets located in your state? If so, please explain how we can avoid double taxation (i.e., are we only assessed on the difference in rates?).

 

It would be beneficial to XXXXX if you would respond in writing on these sales tax issues regarding the taxability of non-resale items for our consumption as it is our intent to comply fully with the law while attempting to keep our distribution operation simplified.

 

Your prompt attention to this matter is appreciated. Please call me if you have any questions at XXXXX.

 

Respectfully,

 

XXXXX

 

 

July 28, 1995

 

XXXXX

RE: Advisory Opinion - Application of Use Tax to Items Consumed by XXXXX Stores in Utah

 

Dear XXXXX,

 

You requested an advisory opinion regarding the use tax liability on tangible personal property brought into Utah for XXXXX’s consumption in local outlets. We find as follows:

 

A use tax imposed when tangible personal property which is purchased outside of Utah is brought into the state for use, storage or other consumption. However, any person who is liable for Utah use tax is entitled to a credit for sales or use tax legally imposed on the same property in another state. If the sales or use tax paid to another state is less than the amount of use tax due to Utah, the difference must be remitted to Utah. No adjustment is allowed if the tax paid to the other state is greater than the tax imposed by Utah.

 

If XXXXX remits sales tax to a state which has no legally imposed it, then ships the property into Utah, Utah use tax is due to no credit is allowed for sales tax paid to the other state. In that case, XXXXX must request the refund from the other state.

 

This opinion is based only on the facts presented in your letter. If additional facts arise which present new questions, please feel free to request another advisory opinion.

 

For the Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner