94-008

Response June 30, 1994

 

 

Request

February 12, 1987

 

XXXXX

Property Tax Division XXXXX

Utah State Tax Commission

160 East 300 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

 

Dear XXXXX

 

Subject: XXXXX

 

The XXXXX in XXXXX is considering opening a warehouse in Utah to handle copper produced by XXXXX. Sales Use tax and property tax regulations will have a major impact on their decision and they would like confirmation, in writing, as to the State Tax Commission's position regarding property taxes.

 

The XXXXX warehouse would operate as follows:

 

1. XXXXX pays XXXXX an “in and out” fee plus storage and insurance fees.

 

2. XXXXX weighs, checks the quality brand and prepares a negotiable instrument called a “warrant” for each lot. At this point, the warrant and copper is owned by XXXXX.

 

3. XXXXX sells the warrant through XXXXX at XXXXX price plus 1.5¢ premium, one-half of the in/out fee and prorated storage costs. Title to the copper passes to the buyer of the warrant.

 

4. The warrant could be sold several times before the copper is actually shipped out of state by XXXXX.

 

Please advise if there would be property tax on the January 1 inventory of copper in the XXXXX warehouse; in other words, would the January 1 inventory be exempt from property tax under Section 59-2-17, 59-2-18.

 

Your early response will be appreciated since XXXXX and XXXXX are anxious to proceed.

 

Very truly yours,

XXXXX


 

 

March 2, 1987

 

Dear XXXXX,

 

This is in response to your letter dated XXXXX regarding XXXXX consideration of opening a warehouse in Utah to handle copper produced by XXXXX and the State Tax Commission’s position regarding property taxes under the scenario stated in your letter.

 

Pursuant to section 59-2-1113 (formally sections 59-2-17 to 59-2-21), the property tax exemption applies to tangible personal property held for sale in the ordinary course of business or for shipping to a final out-of- state destination within twelve (12) months. The Property Tax exemption will apply once the “warrant” is sold to XXXXX. At that point, it is our opinion that the copper has been sold to a buyer for resale.

 

If you have any questions regarding the above, please do not hesitate to contact our office.

 

Sincerely,

 

XXXXX


 

 

April 22, 1994

 

Utah State Tax Commission

Office of the Commissioners

Heber M. Wells Office Building

160 East, 300 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

 

Gentlemen:

 

We have been exploring the possibility of establishing a XXXXX registered warehouse in Utah for the storage of gold and silver. Connect and two precious metal refineries produce these metals in Utah. A significant quantity of the total United States refined precious metals is produced in Utah.

 

We have discussed the concept of operating a precious metals depository with XXXXX sales department, other gold mining companies the independent refineries and with major gold and silver traders. All have expressed interest in the idea and many have indicated that they would support our application and would use the facility

 

Currently XXXXX has depositories only in the XXXXX. We believe that we have a strong case for obtaining a license for a depository in Utah and will present our application to XXXXX when we have met all of their other requirements.

 

Gold and silver are delivered to the XXXXX depositories in 100 and ounce bars respectfully, the quantity of metal designated as one futures contract. A negotiable warehouse receipt is prepared for each lot. The receipts are traded among the various market participants; producers, fabricators, merchants and speculators. The holder of the receipt is the owner of a right to receive a specific lot of gold or silver identified by a lot number in a specific XXXXX depository. These negotiable receipts can trade dozens of times before the gold or silver is removed for ultimate use. All gold and silver held in a depository is held exclusively for resale and is not in a form usable by an end consumer

 

All sales of metal through a XXXXX depository are sales for resale of the commodity in its present form or sale for further fabrication and resale of the fabricated product. Therefore, XXXXX requires that such sales be exempt form sales\use tax, franchise/income tax and property tax. We request that you give us an exemption from these taxes for all transactions on XXXXX related to precious metals stored in Utah.

 

In XXXXX asked the Utah State Tax Commission for a similar ruling concerning the storage of copper which is traded on the XXXXX. The Tax Commission agreed that the above taxes were not applicable to copper traded on the exchange. Subsequently we established a XXXXX licensed warehouse for copper in XXXXX, Utah which has been successful.

 

Thank you for your assistance. If you need any further information, please contact us. If desired we will meet with you or other members of the Utah State Tax Commission.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

XXXXX

 

 

May 5, 1994

 

XXXXX

Utah State Tax Commission

Office of the Commissioners

Heber M. Wells Office Building

160 East, 300 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

 

Dear Mr. Oveson:

 

Subsequent to sending our letter of XXXXX concerning an exemption from certain taxes related to the sale of gold and silver through a Commodity Exchange depository we learned that XXXXX will merge with the XXXXX. The precious metals platinum and palladium are traded on the XXXXX. Initially we had not planned to store these metals. Since XXXXX and XXXXX will be merged we plan to add platinum and palladium to our license.

 

We request that the Utah State Tax Commission add these metals to the exemption from taxes for all transactions on XXXXX related to precious metals stored in Utah.

 

Thank you for your assistance. If you need any further information, please contact us.

 

Sincerely yours,

 

XXXXX

 

 

June 30, 1994

 

Re: Advisory Opinion - Sales/Use Tax, Franchise/Income Tax, and Property Tax Exemption for All Transactions on XXXXX and XXXXX Related to Gold, Silver, Platinum and Palladium Bars Stored in Utah

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

Your requests for an advisory opinion (copies attached) as to whether all transactions on XXXXX and XXXXX related to gold, silver, platinum, and palladium bars stored in Utah qualify for exemption under the Utah Sales and Use Tax Act, Corporation Franchise Tax Act, and property tax statute, were referred to the Auditing Division and the Property Tax Division for their analysis.

 

The Auditing Division's staff recommendations with regard to sales/use tax and corporation franchise/income tax are as follows:

 

1. Utah Code Annotated Section 59-12-103 (copy attached) levies the sales or use tax on sales of tangible personal property to final consumers.

 

2. UCA Section 59-12-102 (copy attached) excludes from the definition of tangible personal property “all gold, silver or platinum ingots, [and] bars... with a gold, silver, or platinum content of not less than 80%.”

 

3. Palladium is also excludable as being part of the platinum group of precious metals.

 

4. Sales of gold, silver, platinum and palladium bars are, therefore, exempt from the Utah sales or use tax if the 80% content requirement is met.

 

5. For Utah corporation franchise tax, it is first necessary to clarify that Utah Commodity Storage Warehouse is a Utah corporation which has elected 'S' corporation status under the IRC and is itself subject to and filing Utah small business corporation franchise tax returns. It is our understanding that the request for exemption in the letter dated April 22, 1994 applies only to corporations which would buy and sell the negotiable warehouse receipts and does not apply to Utah Commodity Storage Warehouse itself.

 

6. Under the current Utah statutes and rules, the holding of the negotiable warehouse receipt by corporations even though domiciled outside of Utah may create taxability under the Utah corporation franchise tax statute. U. C .A. 59-7-101(9) defines “doing business” to include “...the owning, renting or leasing of real or personal property within this state.”

 

7. Notwithstanding the above, it appears that many of the corporations buying and selling the warehouse receipts would not be subject to the corporation franchise tax based on their “de mittimus” level of activity as outlined in Wisconsin Department of Revenue v. William Wrigley Jr. Co.,1992 and in the Statement of Information Concerning Practices of Multistate Tax Commission and Signatory States Under Public Law 86-272 which has been adopted by the Utah State Tax Commission. Nevertheless, any corporations whose activities exceed the “de minimus” standard would be subject to the Utah corporation franchise tax.

 

The Property Tax Division's staff recommendations with regard to property tax are as follows:

 

Utah Tax Code 59-2-1114 states in part:

 

“Tangible personal property present in Utah on January 1, noon, held for sale in the ordinary course of business or for shipping to a final out-of-state destination within 12 months and which constitutes the inventory of any retailer, wholesaler, distributor, processor, warehouseman, manufacturer, farmer or livestock raiser, is exempt from property taxation.”

 

Based upon the representations made in your letters, the gold, silver, platinum and palladium, "held exclusively for resale" is exempt from property taxation in the state of Utah.

 

We might note that the real and personal property used in the warehouse operation would be subject to taxation under the property tax law in the state.

 

Based upon the facts presented in your letters, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's recommendations. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this opinion may be negated.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the Utah State Supreme Court. A Notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the Utah Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For The Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner


 

 

August 4, 1994

 

RE: Clarification of Advisory Opinion dated XXXXX

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

On XXXXX the Tax Commission sent you an advisory opinion concerning transactions on XXXXX and XXXXX related to gold, silver, platinum and palladium bars stored in Utah. That advisory opinion addressed the corporation franchise tax, sales tax and property tax consequences of these transactions. Since receiving that advisory opinion you have requested clarification of the property tax portion of the advisory opinion. This issue was referred to the Property Tax Division for further analysis.

 

They respond as follows:

 

The advisory opinion referenced Utah Code Section 59-2-1114, which is the section that exempts inventory from property taxation as personal property. According to your letter of XXXXX. “All sales of metal through a XXXXX depository are sales for resale of the commodity in its present form or sale for further fabrication and resale of the fabricated product.” The portion of Section 59-2-1114 that is relevant to this issue reads “. . . held for sale in the ordinary course of business . . .” There is no requirement for resale inventory to be sold or shipped out of the state within 12 months. The word “or” which appears before the phrase in the section that reads”. . . for shipping to a final out-of-state destination within 12 months” excludes resale inventory. In other words, to be exempt, personal property must either be resale inventory or be shipped out-of-state within 12 months. Furthermore, subsection (3) of 59-2-1114 clarifies that exempt inventory includes “. . . materials, . . . goods in process, finished goods . . .”

 

Therefore, based on your letter, the gold, silver, platinum and palladium, “held exclusively for resale” is exempt from property taxation in the state of Utah.

 

These letter opinions are kept on file. We hope this informal process is helpful to you.

 

For the Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner