94-0006

Response May 13, 1994 and June 6, 1994

 

 

Request

March 9, 1994

 

XXXXX

Utah State Tax Commission

 

RE: Definition of “de minimis” within R865-19-85S.

 

Dear XXXXX

 

In order to serve our clients better and have a clear understanding of the law XXXXX asks for a definition of “de minimis” its used in R865-19-85S. The 1991 version of Regulation 865-19-85S(B)(4) replaced "predominate use," of the 1990 version, with “de minimis.” Under the 1990 version it was our understanding that manufacturers could only use their machinery for non-qualifying use, less than 49% of the time. However, we are unaware of any determination to define “de minimis.”

 

Regulation 865-19-5S, which covers the new and expanding exemptions states: “Machinery or equipment purchased or leased for use in activities which may qualify it for exemption, as well as in other activities, will not lose the exemption if the use in non-qualifying activities is determined to be de minimis. In other words, new and expanding machinery may only be used to a certain degree for non-qualifying purposes.

 

However, what did the creators of this law intend when using the word “minimis?” For example, XXXXX has purchased a fork lift to be used in transporting raw material and finished product, this qualifies for the new and expanding exemption in all other respects. With the understanding that when the fork lift is used to transport raw material it may be considered as part of the manufacturing process, and when it is used to move finished product, it is not. With the term “de minimis” in mind, how much can the XXXXX company use the new fork lift to transport the finished product? 50%, 0% or 10% of the time. In other words, what is the definition of de minimis in respect to the time used in non-qualifying activities?

 

I realize this percentage may differ with various types of machinery. For example, the de minimis percentage in respect to a fork lift may differ than a punch press or another type of machinery. If this is the case, could you please give us the proper guidelines to interpret the definition of “de minimis” concerning different types of machinery along with the definition of “de minimis.”

 

If you have any questions or concerns please call me at XXXXX. Thank you for your time.

 

Sincerely,

XXXXX

 

 

May 13, 1994

 

Re: Advisory Opinion - Definition of “De Minimis”

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

Your request (copy attached) for an advisory opinion as to definition of the term “de minimis” as used in Tax Commission Administrative Rule R865-19-85S (copy attached) was referred to the Auditing Division for their analysis.

 

The division's staff recommendations are as follows:

 

1. The opinion request is framed with reference to the amount of time the equipment is used.

 

2. Depending on the type and function of machinery or equipment involved, measurement of use based solely upon a time factor may not be determinative. Other measurements may be more appropriate under various situational facts.

 

3. Regardless of the measurement factor deemed most appropriate (whether it be time, units of production, etc.), a use factor in excess of 5 percent will be considered more than de minimis.

 

Based upon the facts presented in your letter, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's recommendations. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this opinion may be negated.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the Utah State Supreme Court. A Notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the Utah Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For The Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner


 

 

June 6, 1994

 

Re: Advisory Opinion - Definition of "De Minimis"

 

Dear XXXXX

 

In XXXXX you sent a letter asking for specific guidelines and a definition of “de minimis” as used in the Tax Commission rule R865-19S-85. In the normal course of business the question was referred to the Auditing Division. They found no previous opinion letters defining “de minimis.”

 

In a cursory search of tax references, the IRS Code and the Utah Code there are several percentages and dollar amounts mentioned. Each relates to a specific instance or law, but there is no generally accepted formula for “de minimis.”

 

In summary, it appears that the definition in Black's Law Dictionary is as clear as we could find. It says de minimis things are “very small or trifling matters.” While I am sure you would prefer the certainty of a percentage, this term is not susceptible of easy, universal definition, therefore, the Commission has used it sparingly and cannot elaborate further.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the Utah State Supreme Court. A notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the Utah Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For The Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner