94-0003

Response April 8, 1994

 

Request

November 15, 1993

 

XXXXX

Utah Tax Commission

160 Est 300 South

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

In response to your letter to the XXXXX dated XXXXX, I would like to obtain an “Advisory Opinion” regarding the initiation of Schedule A agreements. Three separate scenarios have been raised by our customer base in XXXXX.

 

1. We currently have a large lease account that required some modifications to their equipment which increased the investment on each vehicle by approximately XXXXX. As a result of the additional investment, new Schedule A's were executed by both parties. Would this situation qualify for the sales tax exemption.

 

2. If a company operates a large fleet of vehicles, does each vehicles have to operate out of the XXXXX to obtain the exemption, or could the fleet just demonstrate that they operate a percentage of their miles out of state?

 

3. We have a customer who recently requested that we include his annual licensing fees and personal property tax in our monthly fixed charges so he doesn't have to pay a large sum of money all at once. To accomplish this, new Schedule A's were executed three months ago. Since 50 percent of his miles are out of the state, would he qualify for the sales tax exemption?

 

XXXXX, I appreciate your assistance in helping us clarify this sales tax issue with our customer base, if you have any questions please feel free to contact me at XXXXX.

 

Best Regards,

 

XXXXX


 

 

April 8, 1994

 

Re: Advisory Opinion - Sales Tax Exemption for Various Interstate Carrier Leasing Situations

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

Your request (copy attached) for an advisory opinion as to whether certain leasing situations result in sales tax exemption was referred to the Auditing Division for their analysis.

 

The division's staff recommendations are as follows:

 

1. A lease which begins as a taxable lease in Utah continues to be a taxable lease until terminated When a master lease is modified by changes to the master lease's Schedule A, such a change is considered as constituting a termination of the old lease and initiation of a newly negotiated or executed lease. Consequently, if the vehicles involved in the lease meet the qualifications of the exemption as otherwise outlined in Administrative Rule R865-19-97S, the newly executed lease will qualify for exemption. The TC-719 exemption affidavit is required along with the newly executed Schedule A to evidence the exemption. Assuming the other qualifications and criteria for the exemption are met, the new Schedule A executed by both parties will allow the exemption as for a new lease.

 

2. The exemption is “vehicle specific” in that only vehicles which operate regularly in interstate commerce qualify. Fleet mileage ratios do not have the effect of allowing exemption for vehicles operated only intrastate.

 

3. Again, if the vehicles involved otherwise qualify for exemption (vehicle-by-vehicle), newly executed Schedule A's are considered as constituting new leases and make the exemption available from date of execution. As indicated above, fleet mileage percentages are not the criteria for establishing exemption qualification. Each vehicle must be used in interstate commerce to qualify for exemption.

 

Based upon the facts presented in your letter, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's recommendations. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this opinion may be negated.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the XXXXX State Supreme Court. A Notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the XXXXX Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For The Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner