93-025

Response September 17, 1993

 

 

Request

July 21, 1993

 

XXXXX

 

Re: Request for Advisory Letter

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

An advisory opinion of the Utah State Tax Commission is hereby requested for our client based upon the facts outlined below:

 

Factual Background

 

Our client is in the business of designing and installing sophisticated computerized heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. These are installed in large, industrial and institutional applications. They have recently expanded their operations and are in the process of putting together several jobs that will be installed in the XXXXX. Specifically what will happen is that the large refrigeration and ventilation components will be custom ordered from the manufacturer thereof and built to the specifications of the XXXXX installation. These will then be shipped by the manufacturer to our client's facility in Salt Lake County, Utah. The client will then add to those components the necessary computerized control equipment, peripheral equipment and supplies to make up the total system. The total package will then be placed into sea-worthy shipping containers and shipped by the client via truck to California and then via ship to the XXXXX. Once in the XXXXX they will be shipped by truck to the job site and will there be installed by our client's XXXXX affiliate (same ownership as client). The equipment will become a component of the real property once it is installed on the job site in XXXXX.

 

This client purchases all of its equipment and supplies tax free on the basis of the resale exemption because another major part of their business is sales of such supplies and equipment to other contractors whom they charge the sales tax to. When they use equipment and supplies out of their general resale inventory on a real property job on which they are the contractor, they accrue the applicable sales or use tax and remit it on their quarterly report.

 

Several questions arise as to the applicability of sales and use tax on these transactions. We have formulated what we believe are the correct tax treatments of this equipment both for sales tax and use tax purposes. We are herein requesting your advisory letter that the taxability of these items as outlined below is correct. If you do not agree, please outline for us what in your opinion is the proper tax treatment for both sales and use taxes.

 

Use Taxes

 

Use tax rule R865-21-12U provides that tangible, personal property which comes into the State of Utah and which remains in the interstate commerce channel is not subject to use tax. It further provides that the use tax does not apply if the property is brought into Utah for some purpose other than the storage, use or consumption in Utah. Under this rule it appears that the items of equipment which are custom ordered for the jobs in XXXXX, and are shipped to Utah, and then are combined with other components, are not subject to use tax because they remain in the interstate commerce channel. Further, it appears they are not subject to use tax because they are not brought into Utah for storage, use or consumption in Utah, but are brought in to be added to and then shipped out of the State of Utah. In either case such items are not subject to use tax.

 

What of items purchased out of state and placed into the resale inventory which are subsequently taken out immediately to be used on the XXXXX jobs? Clearly if these items were used by the Client in a job within the State of Utah they would be subject to use tax because they would be consumed by the Client in the State of Utah. However, it is not clear that they are taxable under rule R865-21-12U when they are used in the XXXXX components.

 

Rule R865-21-12U provides that the use tax does not apply “if the property is brought into Utah for some purpose other than storage, use or consumption in Utah.” These items of property are brought into the State of Utah for the purpose of resale. They are subsequently pulled out of the resale inventory and bundled with other components for use in the XXXXX jobs. They are sent to the Client's XXXXX affiliate and are installed and become part of the real property in the XXXXX. They are not brought into the State of Utah for storage, use or consumption in the State of Utah.

 

Such items are “brought into Utah for some purpose other than storage, use or consumption in Utah.” Such items should therefore not be subject to use tax under the provisions of Rule R865-21-12U.

 

Sales Tax

 

Section 59-12-104(33) exempts from sales and use taxes sales of tangible, personal property to persons within this state that are subsequently shipped outside the state and incorporated pursuant to contract into and become a part of real property located outside of this state. There is a specific exception that provides the exemption does not apply if the other state or political entity imposes a sales, use or gross receipts tax and allows a credit against such tax for any taxes paid pursuant to Section 59, Chapter 12 of the Utah Code Annotated.

 

All of the installations made in the XXXXX are made in facilities which belong to political subdivisions of the XXXXX and hence no sales, use, gross receipts or other similar transaction excise tax is imposed by the XXXXX on the equipment which is installed in such facilities. Since no such tax is “imposed” the exception to the statutory exemption is not applicable. It would thus appear that the sales of personal property to this client in this state which are subsequently shipped outside of the state and incorporated pursuant to contract and become part of real property in the XXXXX are exempt from sales tax. Therefore, the client should not accrue sales tax on the items of personal property which are purchased in the State of Utah and are subsequently incorporated into the XXXXX contract.

 

As our client is actively pursuing this market in the XXXXX and desires to correctly accrue and remit sales and use tax on all of equipment incorporated into these XXXXX real property contracts, we would appreciate it if you could expedite your reply to this request as much as possible. If you need any further information or clarification, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at once.

 

Respectfully Submitted,

 

XXXXX

 

 

September 17, 1993

 

XXXXX

 

Re: Advisory Opinion - Sales Tax Exemption for Purchases of Materials to be Incorporated into Real Estate in the XXXXX

 

Dear XXXXX:

 

Your request for an advisory opinion (copy attached) as to whether certain exemptions apply to various purchases of items to be converted to realty outside of the United States was referred to the Auditing Division for their analysis.

 

The division's staff recommendations are as follows:

 

1. Rule R865-21-12U does allow for exemption of those items delivered to your client from outside Utah which are specifically ordered and identified as for use outside Utah and are in Utah for purposes other than use, storage or other consumption. Further fabrication, combining several components, and similar activities would meet the qualification of being here for other than the taxable purposes.

 

2. Items which were originally purchased into a resale inventory and subsequently used outside Utah do not qualify for the above treatment. In the final analysis (not that which may have been planned, contemplated or intended originally), the items were purchased for use, storage or consumption. The purchase transaction is what is taxable, even though the taxability and disposition of the item is not determined until later, when it is either resold as tangible personal property or put into a real property job. This is, in fact, the situational treatment as contemplated in the writing of R865-21-12U and its included example.

 

3. We agree that, under the provisions of U.C.A. 59-12-104(33), your client should not pay or accrue sales tax on items of personal property which are purchased in the State of Utah and are subsequently incorporated into realty in the XXXXX.

 

Based upon the facts presented in your letter, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's recommendations. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this opinion may be negated.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the Utah State Supreme Court. A Notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the Utah Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For The Commission,

 

Alice Shearer

Commissioner