Response July 16, 1993
Request
April 21, 1993
State Tax Commission
Commissioners
Heber M. Wells
Building
160 East 300 South
Salt Lake City, Ut
84134
Re: Advisory opinion
on exemption from sales tax
Dear Commissioners:
As tax advisors for
XXXXX, we are writing to request an advisory opinion on the application of the
sales tax exemption for manufacturing equipment to the following facts and
circumstances.
XXXXX is planning to
build a bagel manufacturing center where they will manufacture all of the dough
which is distributed to each of their retail stores for final baking. The new
manufacturing facility will not have any retail operations but will operate
solely as a production center. XXXXX
currently produces the bagels on a much smaller scale on the premises of one of
their retail outlets. The new facility
will greatly expand their bagel producing capacity and will enable them to meet
their expansion plans of four or five new stores in the upcoming year.
It is our
understanding that the bagel making equipment will be exempt from sales tax
because it falls within industry number 2051, bread and other bakery products
and is an expansion of current capacity.
We would appreciate your ruling confirming exemption from sales tax by
XXXXX. We appreciate your help with
this matter. Please contact me at XXXXX
if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
XXXXX
TO: XXXXX, Director
FROM: XXXXX, Secretary
DATE: XXXXX
SUBJECT: Request for Advisory Opinion - No. 93-011DJ
Attached is a request
for an advisory opinion from XXXXX for XXXXX. Will you please review the
request of XXXXX regarding the application of the sales tax exemption for
manufacturing equipment.
Please prepare the
response for signature by the Commission as per the guidelines established by
them.
Thank you.
XXXXX
Re: Advisory Opinion -
Qualification of Machinery and Equipment for Sales Tax Exemption -
Manufacturing
Dear XXXXX:
Your request (copy
attached) for an advisory opinion as to whether certain equipment qualifies for
sales tax exemption was referred to the Auditing Division for their analysis.
The division's staff
recommendation is as follows:
Based solely upon the
information contained in your opinion request, the described equipment meets
the criteria for the exemption as outlined in Administrative Rule R865-19-85S
(copy attached).
Based upon the facts
presented in your letter, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's
recommendation. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this
opinion may be negated.
For the Commission,
Joe B. Pacheco
Commissioner