91-013

 

August 15, 1991 Response from Tax Commission

July 10, 1991 Letter from XXXXX

 

 

August 15, 1991

 

XXXXX

 

Re: XXXXX

 

Dear Mr. XXXXX:

 

This letter is in response to your recent request for a Tax Commission ruling on whether a project entity created under the provisions of Title 11, Chapter 13 of the Utah Code is subject to sales tax. The project entity will be a solid waste disposal district formed by the XXXXX and the XXXXX which, when the two districts are combined into one, will be able to operate more efficiently and economically than the two separate districts. Your concerns are centered on §11-13-26 which states that "Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 59-12-104, a project entity created under this chapter is subject to state sales and use taxes."

 

The Tax Commission policy is to refer such requests to the division most qualified to analyze the request and make recommendations concerning it. As such, your request was referred to the Tax Commission's Auditing Division for their analysis and recommendation. The division's recommendation is as follows:

 

As pointed out, Section 11-13-26 states "Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 59-12-104, a project entity created under this chapter is subject to state sales and use taxes." The language is sufficiently clear to show that if two separate service districts combine into one, they will be subject to sales and use tax.

 

Based upon the facts presented in your letter, we are in agreement with the Auditing Division's recommendations. Obviously, if there are deviations from these facts, this opinion may be negated.

 

If you do not agree with this determination, you may appeal to the Tax Commission for a formal hearing. The results of that hearing would constitute a declaratory judgment and be appealable to the Utah State Supreme Court. A Notice of Appeal Rights and a copy of the Utah Taxpayer Bill of Rights are attached.

 

For the Commission,

 

Joe B. Pacheco

Commissioner


 

 

July 10, 1991

 

XXXXX, Managing Auditor

Sales and Use Tax

Utah Tax Commission

160 East 300 South

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

RE: Utah Code §11-13-26

 

Dear Mr. XXXXX

 

Reference is made to our recent telephone conversation relative to the application of the above referenced Code section to a project entity created pursuant to the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Title 11, Chapter 13, Utah Code, 1953, as amended (the "Act"). The governmental entities creating the project entity are comprised of two special service districts, the XXXXX, created by XXXXX City and three other municipalities, and the XXXXX, created by XXXXX County.

 

I represent the County District and am working with XXXXX, Esq., attorney for XXXXX City. As we were proceeding under the Act we discovered §11-13-26 which reads as follows:

 

Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 59-12-104, a project entity created under this chapter is subject to state sales and use taxes. The sales and use taxes shall be paid, collected, and distributed in accordance with the provisions of law relative to the payment, collection, and distribution of sales and use taxes, including prepayment as provided in chapter 51, title 63. Project entities are authorized to make payments, or prepayments of sales and use tax as provided in Chapter 51, Title 63; from the proceeds of revenue bonds issued pursuant to Section 11-13-19 or other revenues of the project entity.

 

In my telephone conversation with you, you asked that I set forth the facts and request an opinion as to the applicability of the above section to our proposed project entity. We both agreed that it made no sense to have two service district entities which are exempt from sales and use taxes creating a new entity which would be subject to such taxes. It would stand to reason that the new entity should also be exempt.

 

The purpose of the new project entity will be the operation of a permitted sanitary landfill in Utah County to be utilized by the above-named Districts and their respective members but under the management, etc. of the new project entity created pursuant to the Act.

 

Therefore, I request an opinion as to the applicability of the above-referenced Code section to such new project entity. If this section is not applicable then perhaps it ought to be repealed or modified in some way so as to not deter by joint cooperation what can be done singly but not as effectively or economically.

 

Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation in this matter.

 

Yours truly,

 

XXXXX