00-029
Response September 26, 2000
REQUEST
LETTER
00-029
Re: Reporting of
State Tax (Box 17) on a W-2 Form
Dear: Sir/Madame,
Thank you for taking time our of your busy
schedule to assist me with my inquiry, it is greatly appreciated.
I have some
questions with regards to the appearance of the Utah State taxable wages on the
form W-2 in box 17. My question arises
when the employee works in more than one state (or earns all wages outside of
resident state). I will provide two
scenarios below and would like you to please reply in writing how each should
appear for your state on the form W-2.
Please include a telephone number that you may be reached at in case I
have further or follow-up questions.
Scenario #1- An
employee resides in Utah and earns a total income of $100,000 for year
2000. $50, 000 were earned in Utah
and $50,000 were earned in another
state. What should the Utah wages be in
box 17?
Scenario #2- An
employee resides in Utah and earns $100,000 for year 2000. All $100,000 were earned outside of the
state (in other words, all wages were earned outside of resident state). What should the Utah wages be on form W-2 in
box 17?
If you have
questions, you can reach me at the below telephone number. Due to the nature of our business, it is
very important to have clear written documentation to substantiate our actions. Please be kind enough to respond to us in
writing as quickly as your schedule will allow. Also, if at all possible, please fax your response to me at #####. I can also be e-mailed at #####.
COMPANY is a developer of in-house payroll and H/R
software applications. Our goal is to
maintain an accurate system and meet all required compliance.
Sincerely,
NAME
RESPONSE
LETTER
September 26, 2000
RE: Reporting
State Taxable Income on the W-2 Form (AW-2")
Dear NAME,
You have requested us to explain how an employer should report state
wages in Box 17 of the W-2 for a Utah resident who earns wages outside of
Utah. We will first explain what wage
information Utah expects on the W-2 under these circumstances, then address
your two specific scenarios.
When an employee works in two or more states during a given year, Box 1
of the W-2 should contain 100% of the federal wages earned (the income from all
the states combined). To report
information pertinent to state income and state withholding taxes, the W-2
provides three boxes in which an employer reports information: (1) Box 16,
where the state withholding account number is listed; (2) Box 17, where wages
subject to state taxation are listed; and (3) Box 18, where the amount of state
withholding taxes withheld and remitted is listed. The state information provided in these three boxes should
reflect the wages earned and taxes withheld in all states, not just
those wages earned in and those taxes withheld and remitted to Utah. However, the state information reported in
these three boxes should not be aggregated.
Instead, the information relating to each state should be separately
identified.
Scenario #1. If a Utah resident earns $50,000 in Utah and
$50,000 in another state, the employer should list in Box 16 the withholding
account numbers for both states. Box 17
would show $50,000 of income earned in Utah and $50,000 of income earned in the
other state. Lastly, Box 18 would
indicate separately the amount of taxes withheld for each state.
Scenario #2. If a Utah resident earns $0 in Utah and
$100,000 in another state, the employer may still be required to withhold and
remit Utah taxes pursuant to Utah Admin. R. R865-9I-14(B). Accordingly, the employer would still need
to provide information segregated by state.
Box 16 would contain the withholding account numbers for both
states. Box 17 would show $0 of income
earned in Utah and $100,000 of income earned in the other state, while Box 18
would indicate the amount of taxes withheld for each state.
If there is not enough room to include the information for both states
on the W-2 or if the employee worked in three or more states, then additional
W-2's should be prepared showing the amounts attributable to each state where
wages were earned. If you have any
follow-up questions concerning this advisory opinion, please contact NAME.
For the Commission,
Marc B. Johnson
Commissioner