00-025
Response August 23, 2000
REQUEST LETTER
June 7, 2000
We are a company that
provides automated hiring services to retailers. At this time, we are looking at expanding into additional states
and would like to get an opinion on the application of sales and use tax based
on the service outlined below.
Here is a very basic summary:
We supply our customers with
a screen phone that allows them to access our service. The title to, and risk associated with, this
piece of equipment remains with us. The
cost of the equipment is minimal in comparison to the revenue stream of the
services (<5%.)
Job seekers enter a
prospective places of employment and are directed to the screen phone
units. The applicant fills out the
information requested on the screen, then the data is transmitted to our
processing center in STATE. There, the
data is analyzed by software developed by our engineers and housed on our
servers. A completed job application
and a number of other reports are then transmitted back to the hiring manager
at the store location via fax or e-mail.
The revenue stream consists
of a fixed monthly fee charged to the retailer. All data is unique to the
prospective applicant and is not distributed to anyone other than the retailer
paying for the service.
In the future, we will be
able to provide this service without the use of the screen phones. Instead, we
will rely on a web-based application accessed through a link on either our home
page or the retailers' home page.
Please feel free to contact
me with any questions concerning the service at #####. Thank you for your cooperation.
RESPONSE
LETTER
August
23, 2000
RE: Taxability of Hiring Services
Dear NAME,
You
have requested an advisory opinion as to whether sales and use tax should be
imposed on charges for hiring services provided by COMPANY (ACOMPANY@). COMPANY contracts with large Utah retailers
to assist them in their hiring of employees.
As you mentioned by telephone, each customer pays COMPANY a monthly fee
for which COMPANY will process up to ##### applications for a customer and
prepare reports based on the applicants=
responses. To provide these services,
COMPANY supplies each customer with a screen phone on which an applicant
answers a series of questions. The
applicant=s data is then electronically transmitted to COMPANY=s processing center, and within ten minutes, COMPANY=s customer electronically receives an application form
and a personality screening form derived from that applicant=s responses.
Within a week to a month, COMPANY=s
customer receives a background check and criminal history, if any, relating to
that applicant.
COMPANY=s charge for these services, as described above, is
not a taxable transaction. Though the
customer receives from COMPANY tangible personal property (i.e., the forms and
reports), the essence of the COMPANY=s
transactions with its customers is for the services to prepare the forms and
reports and the information contained in them, not for the tangible personal
property by which the information is delivered. Accordingly, COMPANY=s
charges are not subject to sales tax.
In addition, even though the customer receives physical possession of a
screen phone from COMPANY, COMPANY retains ownership of the screen phone and
the customer=s only benefit from the phone is to receive the
services and information provided by COMPANY.
Accordingly, COMPANY=s charges would
not be characterized as the taxable rental or sale of the screen phone to its
customers. Instead, COMPANY is
considered to Aconsume@
the screen phone while providing its nontaxable services. Accordingly, COMPANY would be liable for any
applicable Utah sale or use tax on its purchase of the screen phones.
This
response assumes the facts stated above to be correct. Should they be different, our response may
also be different. If you have any
other questions, please feel free to contact us.
For
the Commission,
Marc
B. Johnson
Commissioner