98-1094

Property Tax

Signed 7/10/98

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

PETITIONER, :

: ORDER

Petitioner, :

: Appeal No. 98-1094

v. :

:

PROPERTY TAX DIVISION OF : Tax Type: Property - Certified Tax Rate

THE UTAH STATE TAX )

COMMISSION, : Presiding: Richard B. McKeown

:

Respondent. :

_____________________________________

Presiding:

Richard B. McKeown, Commissioner, with W. Val Oveson, Chairman, and Pam Hendrickson, Commissioner

Appearances:

For Petitioner: NAME

For Respondent: Rod Marrelli, Executive Director, Utah State Tax Commission

S. Blaine Willes, Director, Property Tax Division

David Vanier, Deputy Director, Property Tax Division


STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission ("Commission") for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on July 2, 1998.

Prior to June 22, 1998, PETITIONER ("PETITIONER") received official notice of its 1998 certified tax rate for property taxation as calculated under Utah Code Ann. §59-2-924. Part of the calculation of this tax rate included adjustments reflecting the changing revenues from uniform fees on tangible personal property that an entity would experience in 1998 due to recent specified legislation. Utah Code Ann. §59-2-924(2)(c),(d) and (e).

Property Tax Division ("Division") calculated and issued these uniform fee adjustments for each entity to incorporate into that entity's certified tax rate. The Division made these adjustments based on the 1997 values for tangible personal property on which the uniform fee was applied. As a consequence, the Division's adjustments did not reflect any changes in 1998 uniform fee revenue that would be caused by 1998 increases in the tangible personal property value.

The PETITIONER petitions the Commission to modify the Division's uniform fee adjustments to reflect changes in uniform fee revenue not only on tangible personal property value that existed in 1997, but also on estimated increases of tangible personal property value that will occur in 1998.

APPLICABLE LAW

Adjustments to the certified tax rate because of changes in uniform fee revenues can be found in Utah Code Ann. §59-2-924(2), pertinent subsections as follows:

(c) Beginning January 1, 1997, if a taxing entity receives increased revenues from uniform fees on tangible personal property under Section 59-2-404 or 59-2-405 as a result of any county imposing a sales and use tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 11, County Option Sales and Use Tax, the taxing entity shall decrease its certified tax rate to offset the increased revenues.

(d) (I) Beginning July 1, 1997, if a county has imposed a sales and use tax under Title 59, Chapter 12, Part 11, County Option Sales and Use Tax, the county's certified tax rate shall be:

...

(B) increased by the amount necessary to offset the county's reduction in revenue from uniform fees on tangible personal property under Section 59-2-404 or 59-2-405 as a result of the decrease in the certified tax rate under Subsection (2)(d)(I)(A).

(ii) The commission shall determine estimates of sales tax distributions for purposes of Subsection (2)(d)(I).

(e) For the calendar year beginning on January 1, 1998, and ending December 31, 1998, a taxing entity's certified tax rate shall be increased by the amount necessary to offset the decrease in revenues from uniform fees on tangible personal property under Section 59-2-405 as a result of the decrease in uniform fees on tangible personal property under Section 59-2-405 enacted by the Legislature during the 1997 Annual General Session.

DECISION AND ORDER

The Commission believes that the language of the above subsections and that legislative intent both require that the uniform fee adjustments also reflect the estimated increases in value that will occur in 1998. Accordingly, the Commission orders the Division to recompute the uniform fee adjustments it prepared in response to the above subsections to also reflect the 1998 estimated increases in value.

For the Division to recompute these adjustments, the Commission has determined that a statewide growth factor of 12.42% (twelve and forty-two one-hundredths percent) should reasonably estimate increases in value for 1998 for all taxing entities, including the PETITIONER. The Division should apply this statewide growth factor by multiplying it with its previously computed uniform fee adjustments for all entities. By so doing and adding this product to the original adjustments, the revised uniform fee adjustments should also reflect changes in revenue associated with the new 1998 values.

After the Division has revised the uniform fee adjustments in this manner, it should calculate the certified tax rates for all taxing entities to reflect these revised adjustments. Any taxing entity which has already received its certified tax rate should be alerted of the change in the calculation of its rate and allowed, at its option, to change its proposed tax rate and amend its final budget, if necessary.

The Commission wishes to point out that the affect of this ruling on the certified tax rate of any taxing entity will be relatively immaterial. However, this ruling addresses the specific question placed before the Commission by the PETITIONER in the manner that best interprets the language and intent of the statute.

This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 10 day of July, 1998.

Richard B. McKeown

Commissioner

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

The Commission has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 10 day of July, 1998.

W. Val Oveson Pam Hendrickson

Chairman Commissioner

Joe B. Pacheco

Commissioner

^^