98-0865

Property Tax/ Centrally Assessed

Signed 10/19/98

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

PETITIONER, :

: ORDER

Petitioner, :

: Appeal No. 98-0865

v. : .

:

PROPERTY TAX DIVISION : Tax Type: Property Tax/Centrally Assessed

OF THE UTAH STATE TAX )

COMMISSION, : Presiding: Phan

:

Respondent. :

_____________________________________

Presiding:

Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

For Petitioner: PETITIONER REP

For Respondent: Kelly Wright, Assistant Attorney General

Elliot Foote, Appraiser

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on September 28, 1998.

Petitioner is appealing the 1998 property tax assessment for property located in COUNTY owned by way of a mining patent. The subject property is very steep in slope, over 30% grade and has no legal right-of-way for access.

Petitioner asked that the value for the 1998 tax year be lowered to the value set for 1995. Petitioner presented five comparable sales which ranged in sale price from $$$$$ to $$$$$ per acre. Petitioner also discussed the slope and lack of access for which he felt there should be a 50% adjustment. In addition the property had no water and it was his opinion that there could be no other value for the property than its value as a mining claim. He felt that the comparables had other uses for example recreation or possible ski resort expansion. However, some of the comparables he presented also had no direct access and were very steeply sloping like the subject property. Petitioner did not explain which comparables should be adjusted by 50% and which should be adjusted by a lesser amount or what that lesser amount would be.

It was Respondent's position that the comparable sales in the area more than supported the value they had placed on the subject property which was $$$$$ per acre. Respondent's representative explained that this was the value they had placed on all the centrally assessed mining properties in COUNTY. In addition Petitioner explained that after the 1995 assessment the mining properties in COUNTY were reappraised.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Petitioner has the burden to establish that the market value of the subject property is other than that as determined by Respondent. Utah Adman. R. R861-1A-7(G). To prevail in a real property tax dispute, the Petitioner must (1) demonstrate that the County's original assessment contained error, and (2) provide the Commission with a sound evidentiary basis for reducing the original valuation to the amount proposed by Petitioner. Nelson V. Bd. Of Equalization of Salt Lake County, 943 P.2d 1354 (Utah 1997).


DECISION AND ORDER

Petitioner's representative has not sufficiently supported his requested value. Respondent's value is more than supported by the comparables. Based on the foregoing the Commission sustains the value for the subject property set for the 1998 tax year. It is so ordered.

This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 19 day of October, 1998.

___________________________________

Jane Phan

Administrative Law Judge

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

The Commission has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 19 day of October, 1998.

Richard B. McKeown

Chairman

Joe B. Pacheco Pam Hendrickson

Commissioner Commissioner

^^