98-0044

Corporate Franchise

Signed 4/15/00

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

COMPANY C, :

:

Petitioner, : DECISION

:

v. :

:

AUDITING DIVISION OF THE : Appeal No. 98-0044

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

STATE OF UTAH, : Account No. #####

:

Respondent. : Tax Type: Corporate Franchise

_____________________________________

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5 An Initial Hearing was held on March 23, 1998. G. Blaine Davis, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner were PETITIONERS REP1., General Counsel for Petitioner, together with PETITIONERS REP.2, CPA, Manager of Tax and Restricted Accounts. Present and representing Respondent were Ms. Vickie Christoffersen and Ms. Laurie Allred, from the Collection Division.

Based upon the evidence in the file and presented at the hearing, the Commission makes its:

FINDINGS

Petitioner is subject to the unrelated business income tax which is set forth in Utah Code Ann. §59-7-801, et.seq., and pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-7-507, is required to make quarterly payments on said amount. The law was amended by the 1995 legislature, to become effective May 1, 1995, but was given retrospective operation to January 1, 1995.

Petitioner was not aware of the changes in the law requiring prepayments, although they had filed extensions of time in which to file the return, and they believed they had until the return was filed in which to make payment of the tax.

Respondents sent notice of the delinquency and of the penalty due, but not until Petitioners had missed making the prepayments for most of the second year. Further, the notices sent by Respondent did not identify the tax at issue, so Petitioner did not know the reason for the proposed penalty.

Ultimately, Petitioner requested a waiver of the penalty, and the penalty was waived for the first year, and it was reduced for the second year to a two percent (2%) underpayment penalty. However, Petitioner has now requested a waiver of the balance of the penalty for the second year. They site their good record and the fact that this was not a problem of them failing to file or pay for a return which they knew was due, but was a matter wherein they were caught unaware by the change in the law.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER

The Tax Commission finds sufficient cause does exist to waive the penalty associated with the underpayment of their unrelated business income tax for 1996. It is so ordered.

This Decision does not limit a party’s right to a Formal Hearing. Any party to this case may file a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner’s name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 15 day of April, 1998.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

G. BLAINE DAVIS

Administrative Law Judge

The agency has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 15 day of April, 1998.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

W. Val Oveson Richard B. McKeown

Chairman Commissioner

Joe B. Pacheco Pam Hendrickson

Commissioner Commissioner

^^