97-1327

CORPORATE FRANCHISE

Signed 2/23/99

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

 

PETITIONER, )

) ORDER

Petitioner, )

) Appeal No. 97-1327

v. ) Account No. #####

)

AUDITING DIVISION OF ) Tax Type: Corporate Franchise

THE UTAH STATE TAX )

COMMISSION, ) Judge: Phan

)

Respondent. )

_____________________________________

 

Presiding:

Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge

Appearances:

For Petitioner: PETITIONER

For Respondent: Kim Ferrell, Manager Corporate Franchise Tax

Loren Squire, Senior Auditor, Corporate Franchise Tax

 

 

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for a Status Conference on February 16, 1999. However, after discussion among the parties, the Status Conference was converted to the Initial Hearing.


Respondent had received notice from the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") of an audit for COMPANY ., for the audit period of February 1, 1988 through January 31, 1990. The IRS audit results carried over so that additional state income tax was due from the corporation. However, at that time the IRS provided no further identifying information for the corporation, other than the name. Apparently Respondent searched the state corporate records and found the COMPANY , with which PETITIONER had been involved. However, PETITIONER COMPANY ., had ceased doing business early in the 1980's and was not in existence during the audit period at issue.

After receiving further identifying information from the IRS prior to this hearing including an address and list of involved parties, Respondent acknowledged that the audit assessment had been made against the wrong COMPANY. In fact, they did not dispute that PETITIONER COMPANY , had not even been in business during the audit period. Respondent did not want the assessment abated as Respondent preferred to pursue the assessment against the correct parties. However, Respondent agreed that the assessment as it pertained to PETITIONER and his COMPANY , should be abated in its entirety.

DECISION AND ORDER

Based on the forgoing the Commission determines that PETITIONER and the PETITIONER., of which PETITIONER was a principal, were incorrectly assessed additional corporate franchise tax by the August 14, 1997, Statutory Notice. For this reason the Commission abates in its entirety the audit assessment against PETITIONER and the COMPANY ., for which he was a principal. Respondent may pursue the correct parties if it is not barred by statute of limitations. It is so ordered.


This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 23RD day of February, 1999.

___________________________________

Jane Phan

Administrative Law Judge

 

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

The Commission has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 23rd day of February, 1999.

Richard B. McKeown Joe B. Pacheco

Chairman Commissioner

 

Pam Hendrickson R. Bruce Johnson

Commissioner Commissioner

^^