97-1278

INCOME

Signed 11/10/97

 

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

 

PETITIONER, )

:

Petitioner, ) DECISION

:

v. )

:

COLLECTION DIVISION OF THE ) Appeal No. 97-1278

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

) Account No. #####

:

Respondent. ) Tax Type: Income

_____________________________________

 

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. '59-1-502.5 An Initial Hearing was held on November 4, 1997. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Petitioner was present and represented himself. Present and representing Respondent was Vickie Christoffersen.

Based upon the evidence in the file and presented at the hearing, the Commission makes its:

FINDINGS

Petitioner is appealing the assessment of penalty and interest for the late filing of the return and payment of his 1989 state income taxes. The penalty assessed was $$$$$ and the interest assessed approximately $$$$$.


Petitioner explained that he had moved out of the State of Utah prior to 1989 and he assumed he was not required to file a Utah return. In January 1993 he was contacted by the State Tax Commission concerning the 1989 tax year. He immediately sent a response which was received by the Tax Commission on January 14, 1993. In the response he explained that he did not live in Utah during 1988 and he provided copies of W-2's from wages he received in STATE and STATE. Petitioner heard no response from the Tax Commission for nearly three years. Then in November 1995 he was contacted by the Auditing Division who maintained that he was domiciled in Utah in 1988 and liable for the income tax.

Petitioner asks that the penalty and interest be waived due to the fact that he did not know he needed to file Utah taxes for 1988 and the length of time it took for the Tax Commission to notify him about the error.

Respondent's representative recommended waiver of the penalty based on first time error. She explained that interest is waived only in the event of Tax Commission error.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. '59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER


After reviewing the information presented by the parties the Commission finds sufficient cause for waiver of the $$$$$ penalty. The Commission also finds that there was Tax Commission error in waiting nearly three years to reply to Petitioner's response. For this reason the Tax Commission waives that portion of the interest which accrued after January 14, 1993. Sufficient cause was not shown to waive the interest which accrued prior to January 14, 1993. It is so ordered.

This Decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. Any party to this case may file a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

 

DATED this 10 day of NOVEMBER, 1997.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

_____________________

Jane Phan

Administrative Law Judge


The agency has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 10 day of NOVEMBER, 1997.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

W. Val Oveson Richard B. McKeown

Chairman Commissioner

 

Joe B. Pacheco Pam Hendrickson

Commissioner Commissioner

^^