97-1246

INCOME

Signed 11/25/97

 

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

 

PETITIONERS, )

:

Petitioners, ) DECISION

:

v. )

:

AUDITING DIVISION OF THE ) Appeal No. 97-1246

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

) Account No. #####

:

Respondent. ) Tax Type: Income Tax

_____________________________________

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: On October 7, 1997 the Utah Supreme Court, in Evans and Sutherland Computer Corp v. Utah State Tax Commission, invalidated the informal adjudicative process by disallowing trial de novo to the District Court. Therefore, your appeal is now being processed as a formal adjudicative proceeding. Under this process, you are entitled to an additional right. Utah Law allows for an Initial Hearing before the matter is heard on the record in a formal proceeding. Therefore, the hearing held in this matter will constitute the Initial Hearing. Please note in the body of the decision your right to, and the method of request for, a formal hearing.

 

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. '59-1-502.5. An Initial Hearing was held on September 29, 1997. Gail S. Reich, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner by telephone was NAME. Present and representing Respondent were Mr. Frank Hales and Mr. Brent Taylor, of the Auditing Division.

Based upon the evidence in the file and presented at the hearing, the Commission makes its:

FINDINGS


This appeal involves the 1991 income tax year. A 10% negligence penalty was imposed for failure to file an amended return within 90 days of an adjustment at the federal level for approximately $$$$$. In addition, penalties are imposed for late payment of the additional amount assessed as the result of an audit from information sent to the state by the federal government. Petitioner indicates that the information sent was premature since he was continuing to fight the battle at the federal level. Ultimately Petitioner was successful in getting the adjustment made at the federal level changed. As a result of that change the state once again corrected its records which resulted in a downward adjustment to the additional amount of tax due. That amount, once assessed, was paid in a timely fashion by Petitioner. However, the fact remains that Petitioner never did file an amended return within 90 days of any of the adjustments made at the federal level as are required by state law.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. '59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER


After a thorough review of the entire matter, it has been determined that the 10% negligence penalty for failure to file an amended return was properly imposed and that the interest properly reflects the fact that Petitioner and not the Respondent had the use of the funds in the interim. However, it is deemed appropriate under these circumstances to waive the penalty imposed for late payment since Petitioner was continuing to work with the federal government to adjust the federal records and according to Petitioner did inform the Tax Commission of that situation. Upon final correction and upon assessment by the State, Petitioner did pay in a timely fashion. It is so ordered.

This Decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. Any party to this case may file a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

 

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this _____ day of ____________, 1997.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

 

_____________________

Gail S. Reich

Administrative Law Judge

 

The agency has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 25 day of NOVEMBER, 1997.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

 

W. Val Oveson Richard B. McKeown

Chairman Commissioner

 

Joe B. Pacheco Pam Hendrickson

Commissioner Commissioner

^^