97-0718

SALES

Signed 1/27/98

 

 

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

 

COMPANY A, )

:

Petitioner, ) DECISION

:

v. )

:

COLLECTION DIVISION OF THE ) Appeal No. 97-0718

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

STATE OF UTAH, ) Account No. #####

:

Respondent. ) Tax Type: Sales Tax

_____________________________________

 

IMPORTANT NOTICE: On October 7, 1997 the Utah Supreme Court, in Evans and Sutherland Computer Corp v. Utah State Tax Commission, invalidated the informal adjudicative process by disallowing trial de novo to the District Court. Therefore, your appeal is now being processed as a formal adjudicative proceeding. Under this process, you are entitled to an additional right. Utah Law allows for an Initial Hearing before the matter is heard on the record in a formal proceeding. Therefore, the hearing held in this matter will constitute the Initial Hearing. Please note in the body of the decision your right to, and the method of request, for a formal hearing.

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. '59-1-502.5 An Initial Hearing was held on September 18, 1997. Gail S. Reich, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner was PETITIONER. Present and representing Respondent were XXXXX and XXXXX, of the Collection Division.

Based upon the evidence in the file and presented at the hearing, the Commission makes its:

FINDINGS


This appeal involves second quarter of 1996. Late payment penalty was imposed in the amount of $$$$$ and approximately $$$$$ of interest has accrued. Petitioner indicated that the initial waiver request involved the first and second quarter of 1996, and was based on a medical condition that had incapacitated the Petitioner. The Division had waived the first quarter but not the second. After a review of the situation it has been determined that the medical condition was responsible for the late payment for both quarters and justifies waiver of the penalty for both quarters. Since the problem was not the result of Tax Commission error and since the Petitioner and not the Tax Commission had the benefit of the funds during the interim period, no grounds exist to waive the interest.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. '59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER

After a thorough review of the entire matter it has been determined that sufficient cause does exist to waive the penalty but not the interest associated with the period in issue. It is so ordered.


This Decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. Any party to this case may file a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, UT 84134

 

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this ________ day of ____________, 1997.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

 

_____________________

Gail S. Reich

Administrative Law Judge

 

The agency has reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.

DATED this 27 day of January, 1998.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

 

W. Val Oveson Richard B. McKeown

Chairman Commissioner

 

Joe B. Pacheco Pam Hendrickson

Commissioner Commissioner


^^