96-2391
Income Tax
Signed 8/7/97
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
PETITIONER, :
:
Petitioners, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 96-2391
:
CUSTOMER
SERVICE DIVISION, : Account No. #####
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on June 26,
1997. Jane Phan, Administrative Law
Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioners was
PETITIONERS REP., CPA. Present and
representing Respondent were Susan Barnum, Assistant Attorney General, along
with Brent Barney and Robert Jenson of the Customer Service Division.
Petitioner
is appealing the assessment of additional Utah individual income tax, penalty
and interest for the tax year 1995. Respondent made the assessment based on the
the income Petitioners had reported on their federal income tax return for
1995.
APPLICABLE LAW
A
tax is imposed on the state taxable income of every resident individual for
each taxable year. (Utah Code Ann.
§59-10-104).
Resident individual is
defined in Utah Code Ann. §59-10-103(1)(j) as follows:
A "resident
individual" is either:
(I) an individual who
is domiciled in this state for any period of time during the taxable year; or
(ii) an individual who
is not domiciled in this state but maintains a permanent place of abode in this
state and spends in the aggregate 183 or more days of the taxable year in this
state.
For
Utah residents, state taxable income is defined as federal taxable income with
some modifications, subtractions and adjustments. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-112.)
For
the purposes of determining state taxable income, federal taxable income means
taxable income as defined in Section 63, of the Internal Revenue Code. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-111.) The Tax Commission is granted the authority
to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of
reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann.
§59-1-401(10).)
ANALYSIS
The
issues put before the Tax Commission in this appeal are whether the additional $$$$$
of Petitioners retirement income, the $$$$$ of deferred income and the $$$$$ of
life insurance income was income taxable in Utah for 1995. Also whether the 10% penalty for failure to
file should be waived.
There
was no dispute that Petitioners were Utah residents for all of 1995. In 1994 they had moved to Utah from
Texas. For 1995 Petitioners filed a
U.S. Individual Income Tax Return reporting federal adjusted gross income of
$$$$$. However, on their Utah Resident
Income Tax Return Petitioners reported federal adjusted gross income of only
$$$$$. When Respondent caught the
discrepancy, Respondent adjusted Petitioners’ 1995 Utah return to include the
$$$$$ of retirement income. This
resulted in an increase of Utah income tax from $$$$$ to $$$$$. Interest and a 10% penalty had also been
assessed.
In
addition to the $$$$$ in retirement income, Petitioners also received $$$$$ of
deferred compensation. Petitioner had earned these funds during 1981 through
1988 but had elected to postpone receipt of these funds until five years after
retirement. Petitioners had also
received $$$$$ in life insurance premium reimbursements.
Petitioners
argue that the retirement income, deferred compensation and insurance premium
reimbursements were for compensation of personal services rendered outside the
State of Utah and were not derived from Utah sources. Petitioners assert that Utah Code Ann. §59-10-117 provides an
exemption from taxation by the State of Utah for compensation earned outside of
Utah. Petitioner’s interpretation of
this statute is clearly erroneous as the statute specifically states that it
applies to nonresidents of Utah.
Petitioners were residents of Utah during all of 1995. Utah residents are subject to tax pursuant
to Utah Code Ann. §59-10-104. Utah
residents are subject to Utah income tax based on their federal taxable income,
regardless of the source of the income.
Petitioners
also argue that they should receive credit for sales taxes and property taxes
paid to the State of Texas during the years when Petitioners were working and
earning the retirement income and deferred compensation. The Commission finds this argument to be
without merit.
As
for the penalty at issue the Commission notes that this was the first income
tax return that Petitioners had filed as Utah residents and based on the first
time filing error criteria finds this to be reasonable cause for waiver of the
penalty. The interest was assessed at
the statutory rate. Interest is waived
only in the event of Tax Commission error as the State of Utah is denied the
benefit of the use of the funds and taxpayers retain the benefit of the use of
the funds until the taxes are paid.
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax Commission,
the Commission finds that Petitioners are liable for Utah income tax on their
retirement income, deferred payment income and insurance premium reimbursement
for the year 1995. The Commission
sustains the assessment of additional tax and the interest thereon. The Commission waives the 10% penalty.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 7 day of AUGUST, 1997.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Richard
B. McKeown
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Pam
Hendrickson
Commissioner Commissioner
^^