96-2209
Income Tax
Signed 3/28/97
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
PETITIONER, :
PETITIONER, :
:
Petitioners, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal Nos. 96-2209; 96-2210;
: 96-2363
COLLECTION
DIVISION OF THE : Account Nos. #####
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, : and #####
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on February 26,
1997. Gail S. Reich, Administrative Law
Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner was
PETITIONERS REP., Esq. Present and
representing Respondent were RESPONDENT REP. andRESPONDENT REP..
The
cases have been consolidated based on identical issues.
Appeal
96-2210 involves Blaine Bitner for 1992 and 1994 income tax. A late filing penalty of $$$$$ and a late
payment penalty of $$$$$ was imposed for the 1992 income tax which was due
April 15, 1993 and was filed and paid July 9, 1996. A late filing penalty of $$$$$ and a late payment penalty of
$$$$$ was imposed for the 1994 income tax year, being due April 15, 1995 and
being filed and paid on July 9, 1996.
Appeal
Nos. 96-2209 and 96-2363 involve PETITIONER.
A late filing penalty of $$$$$ and a late payment penalty of $$$$$ was
imposed for 1992 income tax year, and a late filing penalty of $$$$$ and a late
payment penalty of $$$$$ was imposed for the 1994 income tax year, and late
penalties were imposed for 1995 in the amount of $$$$$. The Petitioners are requesting a waiver of
penalty only. The interest has been
paid. The Petitioners indicate that the
S Corporation for which they were officers and/or directors was in bankruptcy
during the years in issue. Income was
generated for the years in issue, but Petitioners indicate that they did not
have the money to hire accountants and prepare the K- 1's until 1995. As soon as the K-1s became available to them
they were able to file, the time frame resulting in the filing and payment on
July 9, 1996. The Division argues that
the records were not unobtainable but within the possession of the Petitioners
and that the officers and directors had an obligation to maintain the records
prepared in a timely fashion.
APPLICABLE LAW
The
Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise
penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)
DECISION AND ORDER
The
Commission has reviewed the entire matter and the positions of both the
Petitioners and the Respondent. Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive the
penalties for the periods in issue.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 28 day of MARCH, 1997.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Richard
B. McKeown
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^