96-2070
Withholding Tax
Signed 10/9/96
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioner, : INFORMAL DECISION
:
v. :
:
AUDITING
DIVISION OF THE : Appeal No. XXXXX
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
: Account
No. XXXXX
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Withholding Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the Administrative
Procedures Act and the rules of the Utah State Tax Commission for informal
proceedings. This matter had originally
been scheduled for a Status Conference on XXXXX, but upon approval of the
parties the Status Conference was converted to an Informal Hearing in this
matter. Jane Phan, Administrative Law
Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner were
XXXXX and XXXXX. Present and
representing Respondent were XXXXX and XXXXX.
Based
upon the evidence in the file and presented at the Informal Hearing, the
Commission makes its:
FINDINGS
Petitioner
is appealing the assessment of interest in the amount of $$$$$ relating to the
withholding tax for the MMDDYY to MMDDYY period. Petitioner had submitted the year end reconciliation with copies
of W-2's on MMDDYY. Petitioner
indicated an overpayment of $$$$$ and requested a refund of this amount. A Tax Commission employee thought Petitioner
was incorrect, that Petitioner was entitled to a much larger refund, and after
a cursory review of the account issued Petitioner a refund check in the amount
of $$$$$. Of this amount, $$$$$ was interest.
When
Petitioner received the check he contacted the Tax Commission and explained
that the Tax Commission was in error, the refund should have been only
$$$$$. At this point Petitioner was
told to hold on to the refund check while the account was audited for further
reconciliation. The audit revealed that
Petitioner had been correct, or nearly correct, the amount of the refund should
have been $$$$$. Respondent issued a
Statutory Notice requesting that Petitioner repay the refund issued to
Petitioner in error along with interest of $$$$$. The remainder of the interest appealed, $$$$$, had originally
been paid to Petitioner in the incorrect refund check.
Petitioner's
representatives explained that because it was not their error they should not
be penalized with the interest. They
have repaid the overpaid refund and do not dispute the amount of the tax
liability.
Respondent
pointed out that a penalty had not been assessed and the interest was based on
the statutory rate. They told
Petitioner that they would be receiving a refund for the overpaid tax
liability.
APPLICABLE LAW
The
Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise
penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)
DECISION AND ORDER
The
Tax Commission finds sufficient cause has been shown, because of Tax Commission
employee error, to reduce the interest relating to Petitioner's 19YY
withholding from $$$$$ to $$$$$, the amount that was paid to Petitioner in
error in the refund check. It is so
ordered.
DATED
this 9th day of October, 1996.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Richard
B. McKeown
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
NOTICE: You have twenty (20)
days after the date of a final order to file a Request for Reconsideration with
the Commission. If you do not file a
Request for Reconsideration with the Commission, you have thirty (30) days
after the date of a final order to file a Petition for Judicial Review by trial
de novo in district court. (Utah
Administrative Rule R861-1A-5(P) and Utah Code Ann. §63-46b-13 et. seq.)
^^