96-0649

Income Tax

Signed 7/11/96

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

XXXXX,

Petitioners, : ORDER

:

v. : Appeal No. 96-0649

:

COLLECTION DIVISION OF THE : Account No. XXXXX

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

:

Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax

_____________________________________

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner were XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent was XXXXX.

Petitioners are appealing the assessment of interest in the amount of $$$$$ relating to the late payment and filing of income tax for the XXXXX tax year. The Collection Division Waiver Unit has already waived the penalties assessed in this matter.

Petitioners explained that their individual income tax income came from a business which they owned. The had been relying on a bookkeeper in the business to keep accurate records, but shortly before the XXXXX return was due, they discovered some errors. Instead of filing an inaccurate return, they had a new employee try to correct the errors. However, the new employee did not work out either and the Petitioner's ended up taking the matter to a CPA, who was finally able to file and prepare the return in XXXXX. This same CPA had also discovered an error on Petitioner's XXXXX return, which would have entitled Petitioner to a refund of $$$$$. A refund request for XXXXX was submitted in XXXXX, after the three year statute of limitations had expired. The refund request was not processed because of the untimely filing.

It was Petitioner's position that since the Tax Commission had this extra XXXXX from XXXXX for equity reasons, it should off set the $$$$$ owed in interest for XXXXX.

Respondent's representative explained that Petitioners had filed their XXXXX income tax return and paid the tax in XXXXX, a year and a half late. For this reason the assessment of penalty and interest had been appropriate. It was her opinion that the penalty should not have been waived. She explained that the law allows three years for filing a refund request. Petitioners failed to do so for XXXXX and lost the right to claim the refund. Respondent explained that Commission can not offset the refund claim for XXXXX by the interest owed for XXXXX.

Respondent explained that interest is assessed based on the time value of money. It is waived only in the event an error on the part of the Tax Commission or a Tax Commission employee caused the late filing or late payment.

APPLICABLE LAW

If a refund is due because the amount of tax deducted and withheld from wages exceeds the actual tax due, no refund or credit may be made or allowed unless the taxpayer files a tax return claiming the refund within three years from the due date of the return, or within two years from the date the tax was paid. In any other instances where a refund is due, no credit or refund may be allowed unless a tax return claiming the refund is filed within three years from the time the tax was paid. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-529 (7).)

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER

The Collection Division has been generous in waiving the penalties. The Tax Commission is required to enforce the laws as set out by the Utah Legislature, and the Legislature has made it clear that taxpayers have to claim a refund within a three year period of time. Petitioners failed to timely request a refund for XXXXX taxes, so no offset can be allowed against the interest assessed for XXXXX taxes. Petitioners filed their return and paid their tax obligation over XXXXX years late. Further, Respondent is correct in that interest is generally waived only in the event Tax Commission error caused the late filing or payment. There was no indication of Tax Commission error.

Based upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive the interest of $$$$$ relating to income tax for XXXXX.

This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 11 day of July, 1996.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

W. Val Oveson Roger O. Tew

Chairman Commissioner

Joe B. Pacheco Alice Shearer

Commissioner Commissioner

^^