95-1623
Corporate Franchise
Signed 2/29/96
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX,
Petitioner, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 95-1623
:
COLLECTIONS
DIVISION OF THE : Account No. XXXXX
STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
STATE OF UTAH, :
Respondent. : Tax Type: Corporate Franchise
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Gail S. Reich, Administrative Law Judge,
heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner by telephone was XXXXX and
XXXXX. Present and representing
Respondent was XXXXX.
This
appeal involves corporate franchise tax for the year ending XXXXX. Underpayment penalties were assessed in the
amount of $$$$$. Interest has incurred
in the amount of approximately $$$$$.
The penalties were imposed on the underpayment amounts since Petitioner
failed to prepay either 100% of the prior year’s tax, or 90% of the current
year’s tax. Additionally, no
prepayments were made for the first two periods of the fiscal year in
issue. The payments for the second two
periods did not meet either of the prepayment requirements.
Petitioner
indicated that the type of business, that is, engineering and construction,
results in wide fluctuations in earnings
from year to year and quarter to quarter, preventing the Petitioner from
being able to estimate the tax for the year.
Respondent indicated that that is precisely the reason that there is an
alternative, namely, being able to pay 100% of the prior year’s tax. Petitioner indicated that it was not even
possible to know the prior years tax for the first two quarterly payments of
the year in issue. Petitioner indicated
that it would require looking at two years prior for an estimate. Following Petitioner’s logic and looking at
the record two years prior to the year in issue, Petitioner is showing a tax
liability of $$$$$. That would require
a $$$$$ payment per quarter. Not even
that amount was paid. In fact, nothing
was paid for the first two quarters.
APPLICABLE LAW
The
Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise
penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann.
§59-1-401(10).)
DECISION AND ORDER
The
Commission has reviewed the entire record and the arguments presented by the
parties.
Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive
the penalties or interest assessed for the corporate franchise year ending
XXXXX.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 29 day of February, 1996.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^