95-1596

Income Tax

Signed 1/19/96

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

XXXXX, )

:

Petitioners, : ORDER

:

v. : Appeal No. 95-1596

:

AUDITING DIVISION OF THE : Account No. XXXXX

UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :

:

Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax

_____________________________________

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. The matter had originally been scheduled for a Status Conference but the Status Conference was converted to an Initial Hearing upon the approval of the parties. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner by telephone conference call was XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent were XXXXX and XXXXX.

Additional tax, penalties of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$ were assessed against Petitioner relating to his income tax for the year XXXXX. The assessment was based on an audit by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the resulting final determination increasing Petitioner's federal taxable income. The IRS reported the increase of Petitioner's federal taxable income to Respondent. Respondent made the appropriate changes to Petitioner's state taxable income issuing the statutory notice of audit change on XXXXX. Petitioner now appeals only the penalty and interest.

At the hearing Petitioner explained that at the time of the IRS assessment he was not aware that he had to file an amended return with the State of Utah. Further, Petitioner was confused about when the IRS's determination became final. Petitioner thought the final determination from the IRS occurred in XXXXX of XXXXX, after the State of Utah's statutory notice was issued. Petitioner may have been confused because of the notices Petitioner received through the IRS collection process. Petitioner explained that his wife had earned some interest income during XXXXX of which he was not aware when he filed his income taxes for that year as they were in the process of divorcing. The IRS increased Petitioner's federal taxable income by the amount of this interest income. Petitioner stated that he did not purposefully withhold information nor was he intentionally deceitful. Petitioner states that he is currently unemployed and requiring payment would be a financial hardship.

Respondent explained that the Utah Code requires the taxpayer to notify the Commission, by filing an amended return, within 90 days of a final determination from the IRS which affects the taxpayer's state tax liability. If a taxpayer fails to notify the Commission within the 90 days the 10% negligence penalty is applied.

APPLICABLE LAW

State taxable income is defined as federally taxable income with some modifications, subtractions and adjustments. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-112.)

For the purposes of determining state taxable income, federal taxable income means taxable income as defined in Section 63, of the Internal Revenue Code. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-111.)

If a change is made in a taxpayer's net income on his or her federal income tax return, either because the taxpayer has filed an amended return or because of an action by the federal government, the taxpayer must notify the Utah Tax Commission within 90 days after the final determination of such change. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-536 (5)(a).)

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER

When the IRS made a final determination to increase Petitioner's federal taxable income, this resulted in a change in Petitioner's state taxable income. The legislature, by statute, has placed the burden upon the taxpayer to notify the State Tax Commission of this change. Petitioner failed to do so and the 10% penalty was assessed along with interest from the time the additional tax was originally due in XXXXX of XXXXX, Neither financial hardship nor ignorance of the law rise to the level of reasonable cause sufficient for waiver of penalties or interest.

Based upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive the penalties of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$ relating to Petitioner's income tax for XXXXX.

This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 19th day of January, 1996.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

W. Val Oveson Roger O. Tew

Chairman Commissioner

Joe B. Pacheco Alice Shearer

Commissioner Commissioner

^^