95-1114
Income Tax
Signed 11/16/95
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioners, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 95-1114
:
AUDITING
DIVISION OF THE : Account No. XXXXX
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for a Status Conference, but
was therein converted, pursuant to stipulations of the parties, to an Initial
Hearing pursuant the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. XXXXX, Administrative Law Judge, heard the
matter for and on behalf of the Commission.
Present on the telephone and representing Petitioners were XXXXX, CPA,
together with the Petitioner, XXXXX.
Present and representing Respondent were XXXXX and XXXXX from the
Auditing Division.
This
problem originated when Petitioners failed to include one of their W-2 forms on
their XXXXX individual income tax return.
Thereafter, the Internal Revenue Service made an adjustment, and
Petitioners paid the amount of the additional tax to the I.R.S. Petitioners did not file an amended return
with the State of Utah, and indicated that they just presumed that they would
wait until they received a notice from the Utah State Tax Commission. Nevertheless, the statute requires the
filing of an amended return within 90 days after an adjustment by the Internal
Revenue Service.
Because
of the failure to file an amended return, the Respondent imposed a 10%
negligence penalty, and later imposed another penalty for failure to pay the
amount due on a timely basis after receiving notice of the additional amount
due.
There
is also a dispute regarding a refund check which Respondent says was paid to
Petitioners on XXXXX by way of check number XXXXX in amount of $$$$$. Petitioners say they do not remember
receiving the stated refund check.
Following the hearing, Respondent provided a photocopy of the check
which appears to bear the signatures of both Petitioners. The Commission finds that the check was
received by Petitioners.
The
State also stopped the XXXXX refund of Petitioners in an amount of
approximately $$$$$, and applied it to the past due amount. At the time of the hearing, there was an
amount due of approximately $$$$$. That
represents all taxes, penalty, and interest, minus all payments and the refund
check which was stopped.
The
Petitioners did ultimately file an amended tax return, but they did not do so
within the 90 days, and did not file the amended return until after they had
received notice from the State Tax Commission that they had failed to file.
Accordingly,
after discussion, it appears that the only dispute with the Petitioners is
whether the refund in the amount of $$$$$ was paid and refunded to Petitioners.
The Commission finds that the refund was paid to Petitioners.
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds that the Petition for Redetermination of
Petitioners should be, and is hereby
denied. The assessment against
Petitioners is affirmed.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 16 day of November, 1995.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^