95-1011

Income Tax

Signed 1/19/96

BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION

____________________________________

XXXXX, )

:

Petitioner, : ORDER

:

v. : Appeal No. 95-1011

:

COMPLIANCE AUDITING UNIT OF ) Account No. XXXXX

THE COLLECTION DIVISION, :

:

Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax

_____________________________________

STATEMENT OF CASE

This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner was XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent was XXXXX.

Petitioner is appealing the assessment of what he felt was additional income tax, penalty and interest for the years of XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX and XXXXX. For XXXXX the income tax was $$$$$ and interest assessed $$$$$, with a remaining balance of $$$$$. For XXXXX the tax was $$$$$, the penalty $$$$$, the interest $$$$$, with a remaining balance of $$$$$. For XXXXX the tax was $$$$$, the penalty $$$$$, the interest $$$$$ and remaining balance $$$$$. For XXXXX the tax was $$$$$, the penalty $$$$$, the interest $$$$$ and the balance $$$$$. For XXXXX the tax was $$$$$, the interest $$$$$ and the unpaid balance was XXXXX. Petitioner's account also shows an unpaid balance for XXXXX, but he did not request appeal of that year.

Petitioner admitted that he filed his XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX and XXXXX income tax returns late. He says he had an attorney prepare his state and federal returns for these years and filed them all at one time in XXXXX. Petitioner states that he thought that he had paid the tax due at that time, so he did not understand when he got notices from the Tax Commission stating that he had a balance of tax, penalty and interest. Petitioner did not provide bank records or any other evidence of the amount of taxes that he had paid. For XXXXX Petitioner knew that he had not paid all the income tax that he owed.

Petitioner stated that he could not cope with filing and paying taxes for the years in questions because he was going through a divorce and had problems of financial hardship. Further, Petitioner states that he has current financial hardship problems that would make it very difficult for him to pay all the taxes, penalties and interest.

Respondent stated that the records indicated that Petitioner filed the returns late and that Petitioner had not paid all the income tax owed at that time. Respondent stated that the underlying income tax amounts were the amounts shown on the tax returns Petitioner had filed. He stated that Petitioner was merely delinquent in paying all his taxes.

Further, he pointed out to Petitioner that any amount Petitioner had paid would first go towards the interest assessed, then penalty, then tax. Late payment and/or late filing penalties had been assessed along with interest on the unpaid balance from the date Petitioner's income tax returns were was due. So when Petitioner filed the returns for XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX and XXXXX late, in XXXXX, even if he had paid the full income tax amount it would have been insufficient because of the penalties and interest assessed. Respondent stated that financial hardship is not considered reasonable cause for the purpose of waiving penalties or interest.

APPLICABLE LAW

The Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)

DECISION AND ORDER

Petitioner was delinquent in filing and paying his income taxes for a period of several years and his account history indicates a pattern of late payment and late filing. From the file and information presented Petitioner had not paid the full amount of the tax, penalties or interest when he filed his returns late in XXXXX. Financial hardship is not reasonable cause for waiver of penalties or interest.

Based upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax Commission, the Commission affirms the assessment of income tax and finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive the penalties and interest assessed for the XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX and XXXXX tax years.

This decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:

Utah State Tax Commission

Appeals Division

210 North 1950 West

Salt Lake City, Utah 84134

Failure to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or appeal rights in this matter.

DATED this 19th day of January, 1996.

BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.

W. Val Oveson Roger O. Tew

Chairman Commissioner

Joe B. Pacheco Alice Shearer

Commissioner Commissioner

^^