95-0913
Income
Signed 12/4/95
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioners, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 95-0913
:
AUDITING
DIVISION OF THE : Account Nos. XXXXX
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, : & XXXXX
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Income Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. This matter had originally been scheduled
for a Status Conference but the Status Conference was converted to an Initial
Hearing upon the approval of the parties.
Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf
of the Commission. Present and
representing Petitioner by telephone conference call was XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent were
XXXXX and XXXXX.
Additional
tax of $$$$$, XXXXX, penalties of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$
were assessed against Petitioners relating their income tax for the year XXXXX. The assessment was based on an Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) audit and resulting final determination increasing
Petitioners' federal taxable income.
The IRS reported the increase of Petitioners' federal taxable income to
the Respondent. The Respondent made the
appropriate changes and issued the statutory notice of audit change on XXXXX,
assessing the additional tax penalty and interest. Petitioners now appeal only the penalty and interest.
At
the hearing, and in correspondence filed with the appeal Petitioners explained
that they were not aware that they had to contact the Tax Commission concerning
the IRS's change in their federal taxable income. Petitioners state that the IRS did not tell them they needed to
contact the State Tax Commission. Petitioners further asserted that the length
of time between when they filed their XXXXX return, which was filed early in
XXXXX of XXXXX, and when the assessment was made, in XXXXX, was an error on the
part of the Tax Commission contributing to the amount of interest.
Respondent
explained that the statutes set out in the Utah Code require the taxpayer to
notify the Commission by filing an amended return within XXXXX days of a final
determination of the IRS which affects the taxpayer's state tax liability. If the taxpayer fails to notify the Tax
Commission, the Commission is not aware of the change until so notified by the
IRS which may take several years. The
delay in Petitioners' case was caused by Petitioners' failing to file an
amended return with the State of Utah.
APPLICABLE LAW
State
taxable income is defined as federal taxable with some modifications,
subtractions and adjustments. (Utah
Code Ann. §59-10-112.)
For
the purposes of determining state taxable income, federal taxable income means
taxable income as defined in Section 63, of the Internal Revenue Code. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-111.)
If
a change is made in a taxpayer's net income on his or her federal income tax
return, either because the taxpayer has filed an amended return or because of
an action by the federal government, the taxpayer must notify the Utah Tax
Commission within 90 days after the final determination of such change. (Utah Code Ann. §59-10-536 (5)(a).)
The
Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise
penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)
DECISION AND ORDER
When
the IRS made a final determination to increase Petitioners' federal taxable
income this resulted in a change in Petitioners' state taxable income. The legislature, by statute, has placed the
burden upon the taxpayer to notify the State Tax Commission of this
change. Petitioner failed to do so and
the 10% penalty at issue was validly assessed.
Further, ignorance of the law is not sufficient reasonable cause for
waiver of penalties or interest.
Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive
or reduce the penalties and interest assessed relating to Petitioners' income
tax for XXXXX.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 4 day of December, 1995.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^