95-0877
Income
Signed 9/28/95
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioner, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 95-0877
:
COLLECTION
DIVISION, : Account No. XXXXX
OF THE UTAH STATE :
TAX COMMISSION, :
Respondent. : Tax Type: Income
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard
the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Respondent was XXXXX. Present and representing Petitioner was
XXXXX.
Penalties
in the amount of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$ were assessed
against Petitioner relating to income tax for XXXXX. Petitioner had requested a waiver of the penalties and interest
from the Collection Division Waiver Unit which was denied. Petitioner now appeals the penalties and
interest.
At
the hearing Petitioner explained that for the XXXXX tax year he had planned on
filing taxes jointly with his wife and had an arrangement with his wife that
she would have extra withholding taken out of her pay check while Petitioner
had less take from his paycheck. The
idea was that the withholding would be combined in the joint filing. However, Petitioner stated that in XXXXX,
just a few days prior to the filing deadline, Petitioner's spouse separated
from Petitioner and refused to file a joint return. They were later divorced.
This left Petitioner with a state tax liability of $$$$$ of which only
$$$$$ had been withheld from Petitioner's wages. Petitioner went on to explain that he was not able to control how
the taxes were filed, that his actions were what a reasonable person would have
done under the circumstances and he felt that he had been duly diligent. The circumstances were beyond his control
and under his ex-wife's control.
Petitioner
states that because of his ex-wife's unexpected decision not to combine
withholding, along with other separation expenses, he was unable to pay the
XXXXX income tax liability on XXXXX. So
Petitioner filed his return timely with a letter asking that arrangements be
made for payment. Petitioner states
that he initiated contact concerning a payment plan and it was maybe XXXXX
before the Tax Commission set one up, although Petitioner had already started
making payments prior to this time.
Petitioner made payments timely pursuant to the payment plan. Petitioner stated that prior to the year in
question he had a XXXXX year history of no late payments or late filings. And after this incident he has again been
timely. Petitioner stated that because
of the costs of divorce, alimony and other debts he was required to pay he had
to declare bankruptcy.
Respondent
stated that the return had been filed timely by Petitioner but payment was not
with the return. The penalty assessed
had been a 10% late payment penalty based on the unpaid balance at the time of
the filing. Respondent stated that
divorce and financial difficulty did not come under the reasonable cause
guidelines for waiver of penalties and interest. Interest is waived generally only when an error on the part of
the Tax Commission or a Tax Commission employee caused the late payment or
filing.
APPLICABLE LAW
The
Tax Commission is granted the authority to waive, reduce, or compromise
penalties and interest upon a showing of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. §59-1-401(10).)
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the hearing, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive
or reduce the penalties of $$$$$ and interest assessed relating to Petitioner's
XXXXX income tax.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files
a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 28 day of August, 1995.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^