94-1469
Sales Tax
Signed 3/5/95
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioner, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 94-1469
:
COLLECTION
DIVISION OF THE : Account No. XXXXX
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Sales Tax
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for a Settlement Conference
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard
the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner was XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent was
XXXXX.
Penalties
of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$ were assessed against Petitioner
for the late payment of the XXXXX XXXXX sales tax. Petitioner had requested a waiver of these penalties and interest
from the Collection Division Waiver Unit which was denied. Petitioner is now appealing this
denial. The underlying amount of the
sales tax for the period in question was $$$$$.
At
the conference Petitioner's representative stated that Petitioner had filed and
sent in the check timely for payment of the XXXXX taxes. Petitioner's representative stated that
Petitioner did receive notice from its bank saying the check had been returned
to the Tax Commission unpaid because of the insufficient funds in Petitioner's
account. Petitioner did nothing at this
time because it thought that the Tax Commission would redeposit the check.
In
XXXXX, Petitioner's representative stated that they received a notice from the
Tax Commission requesting payment of the XXXXX sales tax. Petitioner's representative then contacted
the Tax Commission by phone and was told that the check had been returned
unpaid for insufficient funds.
Petitioner's representative asked for the check but the person she spoke
with did not have it. Petitioner was
confused as to what it should do because the Tax Commission did not produce the
unpaid check so Petitioner did not send in a new check until XXXXX.
Respondent
stated that the Tax Commission has an established policy that it does not
resubmit returned checks. Further, the
Respondent stated the XXXXX late payment penalty is statutory and was validly
assessed in this matter. Respondent did
not feel that Petitioner had established reasonable cause sufficient to waive either
the penalty or the interest.
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the conference, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive
or reduce the penalties of $$$$$ and interest of approximately $$$$$ assessed
for the Petitioner's sales tax filing for the XXXXX.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a formal hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 15th day of March, 1995.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^