94-1462
Corporation Franchise
Signed 3/9/95
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, )
:
Petitioner, : ORDER
:
v. : Appeal No. 94-1462
:
COLLECTION
DIVISION OF THE : Account No.XXXXX
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
:
Respondent. : Tax Type: Corporation Franchise
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for a Settlement Conference
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Jane Phan, Administrative Law Judge, heard
the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Present and representing Petitioner were XXXXX. Present and representing Respondent was
XXXXX.
Petitioner
was assessed penalties of $$$$$ and interest of $$$$$ relating to the late
payment and filing of corporate franchise tax for the period from XXXXX. Petitioner had requested a waiver of these
penalties and interest from the Collection Division Waiver Unit who denied the
request.
Petitioner's
representatives stated that Petitioner is a XXXXX with a XXXXX. In the year in question Petitioner had an
XXXXX. Because of this, the XXXXX and
the fact that Petitioner's XXXXX could not review the information right away,
it was XXXXX XXXXX before Petitioner
could determine the amount of the tax liability. As soon as the tax liability
was determined Petitioner did file and pay.
Realizing
there would be a delay, Petitioner filed an extension but did not pay an
estimated amount because Petitioner did not think that any amount of taxes
would be due.
Respondent
stated that Petitioner should have been filing on a XXXXX because the
Petitioner had a liability of over $$$$$ in the prior year. Further, Respondent stated that for the
prior year a penalty had been assessed against Petitioner for not filing XXXXX,
then Petitioner was granted a waiver because it was a first time filing
error. Respondent did recommend
reducing the penalties to the XXXXX late penalty which would decrease the
penalties from $$$$$ to $$$$$.
In
considering Petitioner's request for waiver or reduction of the interest the
Tax Commission applies more stringent reasonable cause standards because
Petitioner continued to enjoy the benefit of the use of the funds and the State
of Utah was denied the benefit of the use of the funds from the time the
underlying taxes were due until they were actually paid by Petitioner.
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the conference, and the records of the Tax
Commission, the Commission finds sufficient cause has been shown to reduce the
penalties from $$$$$ to $$$$$ for the corporate franchise tax for the XXXXX tax
period. Sufficient cause had not been
show to waive or reduce the interest assessed.
This
decision does not limit a party's right to a formal hearing. However, this Decision and Order will become
the Final Decision and Order of the Commission unless any party to this case
files a written request within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to
proceed to a Formal Hearing. Such a
request shall be mailed to the address listed below and must include the
Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
210 North 1950 West
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure
to request a Formal Hearing will preclude any further administrative action or
appeal rights in this matter.
DATED
this 9th day of March, 1995.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^