93-1696
Sales
Signed 5/24/94
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX dba
XXXXX's )
of XXXXX, : FINDINGS OF FACT,
Petitioner, ) CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW,
v. : AND FINAL DECISION
)
COLLECTIONS
DIVISION OF THE : Appeal Nos. 93-1696
UTAH
STATE TAX COMMISSION, )
and 93-2199
Respondent. : Account No. XXXXX
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF
CASE
This matter came before the Utah State
Tax Commission for a formal hearing on XXXXX, Lisa L. Olpin, Administrative Law
Judge, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Petitioner represented himself. Present and representing the Respondent was
XXXXX.
Based upon the evidence and testimony
presented at the hearing, the Tax Commission hereby makes its:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1.
The tax in question is sales and use tax.
2.
The months in question are XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX, and XXXXX of the year
XXXXX, and XXXXX and XXXXX of the year XXXXX.
3.
Petitioner is requesting a waiver of the penalty and interest
assessments on the various sales and food tax filings and payments for the
months listed above.
4.
According to Mr. XXXXX, he tried to file and pay timely on all of the
months in question using the Tax Commission's new electronic filing
system. He stated that the system was
not working correctly.
5.
In support of his position, Mr. XXXXX submitted a newspaper article
issued by the Utah Taxpayers Association wherein the Executive Director of the
Tax Commission is quoted saying that all penalty and interest assessments
levied in the first six months of the use of the Electronic Funds Transfer
System will be automatically waived (July - December XXXXX).
4.
At the formal hearing in this matter, XXXXX of the Collections Division
agreed to waive all penalties and interest associated with late payments and
late filings on the sales and food tax returns for the months XXXXX through
XXXXX.
5.
With those months resolved as far as the Commission is concerned, all
that remains is whether or not reasonable cause exists to waive penalty and
interest assessments for the months of XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX.
6.
According to Commission records, Petitioner filed its XXXXX sales and
food tax returns with payment on XXXXX.
As a result, the Commission assessed Petitioner three ten percent
penalties ($$$$$ x 3) on the late sales and use tax filing/payment and a single
ten percent penalty ($$$$$) on the late food tax filing/payment.
7.
Again, according to Commission records, Petitioner filed its XXXXX sales
and food tax returns late, on XXXXX.
The payments, however, were received timely. As a result of the late filings, the Commission assessed
Petitioner two ten percent penalties ($$$$$ x 2) on the late sales tax return
and a single ten percent penalty ($$$$$) on the late food tax filing.
8.
Mr. XXXXX, Petitioner's owner, maintains that the returns and payments
for XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX were all filed and paid timely. He is not sure why the Commission is showing
them late. Because of past problems
with Petitioner's sales account number, he supposed that the Commission used
number XXXXX as opposed to the true number XXXXX and lost the filings.
9.
Petitioner's account history shows repeated late penalties for the years
of quarters preceding XXXXX.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Tax Commission is granted the
authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing
of reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. '59-1-401(8).)
DECISION AND
ORDER
The Commission confirms the
recommendation by the Collection Division to waive all penalty and interest
assessments for the months XXXXX, XXXXX, XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX on sales and
food tax.
The Commission, however, finds no
reason to waive the penalties and interest assessed for the remaining two
months of XXXXX and XXXXX XXXXX on the same tax types. Commission records do not substantiate
Petitioner's claims for the lateness and Petitioner has not shown sufficient
evidence in support thereof.
It is so ordered.
DATED this 24th day of May, 1994.
BY ORDER
OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
NOTICE: You have twenty (20) days after the date of
the final order to file a request for reconsideration or thirty (30) days after
the date of final order to file in Supreme Court a petition for judicial
review. Utah Code Ann. ''63-46b-13(1), 63-46b-14(3)(a).
^^