93-2193
Income
Signed 5/24/94
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
XXXXX, :
:
Petitioner, : ORDER
:
v. :
:
COLLECTIONS
DIVISION OF THE : Appeal No. 93-2193
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION, :
: Account No.
XXXXX
Respondent. :
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission for a Settlement Conference
pursuant to the provisions of Utah Code Ann. §59-1-502.5, on XXXXX. Lisa L. Olpin, Administrative Law Judge,
heard the matter for and on behalf of the Commission. Petitioner represented herself by telephone. XXXXX was present on behalf of Respondent.
According
to Tax Commission records, Petitioner and her then-husband filed their XXXXX
joint tax return on time. A balance of
$$$$$ was due, but not paid. A $$$$$
penalty for nonpayment was assessed.
Later,
Petitioner divorced.
In
XXXXX, Petitioner discovered a Utah tax lien for taxes due for the year
XXXXX. She contacted the Commission and
paid the balance, including interest in the amount of $$$$$.
She
is requesting a waiver of the penalty and interest at this time.
Petitioner
explained that her ex-husband had told her that he had paid the XXXXX taxes
with a $$$$$ insurance settlement. She
did not have cause to question him because she never received a notice from the
Commission indicating a problem for XXXXX.
Petitioner
contends that the Tax Commission should have notified her as well as her
ex-husband of the delinquency. She has
filed her own returns in subsequent years and could have been cross-referenced
for notice purposes.
She
came forward and paid the delinquent amount on her own accord. She does not feel that she should be held
liable for penalty and interest amounts for XXXXX.
Ms.
XXXXX of the Collections Division stated that the Commission had been sending
notices to the last known address and to Mr. XXXXX, the ex-husband.
DECISION AND ORDER
Based
upon the information presented at the conference, and the records of the Tax Commission,
the Commission finds sufficient cause has not been shown to waive the penalty
assessed on the XXXXX individual income tax.
Petitioner,
however, proposes a convincing argument on the issue of interest. It is now a question of fairness of how to
best determine the amount of interest due.
The
Commission determines that interest will be calculated to XXXXX.
This
Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and Order of the Commission
unless any party to this case files a written request for a Formal Hearing
within ten (10) days of the date of this decision. Such a request shall be mailed to the address listed below and
must include the Petitioner's name, address, and appeal number:
Utah State Tax Commission
Appeals Division
160 East 300 South
Salt Lake City, Utah 84134
It
is so ordered.
DATED
this 24th day of May, 1994.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
^^