93-0769
Income
Signed 9/22/93
BEFORE
THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION
____________________________________
In Re: )
:
XXXXX, ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
: CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW,
) AND
FINAL DECISION
:
) Appeal
No. 93-0769
: Account
No. XXXXX
_____________________________________
STATEMENT
OF CASE
This matter came before the Utah State Tax
Commission for a formal hearing on XXXXX.
Lisa L. Olpin, Presiding Officer, heard the matter for and on behalf of
the Commission. Petitioner was present
and represented himself.
Based upon the evidence and testimony
presented at the hearing, the Tax Commission hereby makes its:
FINDINGS
OF FACT
1.
The tax in question is individual income tax.
2.
The period in question is the year XXXXX.
3.
Petitioner timely filed his XXXXX individual income tax return in
XXXXX. The Tax Commission later
corrected Petitioner's return as Petitioner had referenced the wrong table in
calculating his taxes. He had used a
figure from the married, head of household column when, in fact, Petitioner was
single.
4.
Tax Commission records show that a notice of correction was sent to
Petitioner in XXXXX. The first notice
and demand for payment of taxes was sent in XXXXX with a payment due date of
XXXXX.
5.
Mr. XXXXX testified that he was unaware of any correction to his return
until he received the demand for payment letter. At that time, the penalty and interest assessments had already
been assessed. He immediately wrote the
Tax Commission protesting these charges in his letter of XXXXX.
6.
Petitioner paid the additional tax amount owing on XXXXX and says he
requested a waiver of the penalty and interest amounts at that time.
7.
Mr. XXXXX stated that the Commission refused to process his waiver
request until he paid the entire amount assessed. A $$$$$ legal fee was added in XXXXX.
8.
Petitioner feels that fairness is at issue. He was out of work from the aerospace business for eleven months
recently. He has since married and
acquired six children to care for. He
feels that he should have been allowed to correct his return before the penalty
and interest charges were levied against his account.
7. He
states that the additional $$$$$ plus interest is a financial hardship.
CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW
The Tax Commission is granted the authority
to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing of
reasonable cause. (Utah Code Ann. '59-1-401(8).)
DECISION
AND ORDER
Based upon the foregoing, the Tax Commission
finds that sufficient cause has been shown which would justify a waiver of the
$$$$$ penalty associated with the late payment of individual income taxes due
on the year XXXXX in that there appears to have been miscommunication between
the Tax Commission and Petitioner regarding the correction changes. The interest amount and legal fee are not
waived. It is so ordered.
DATED this 22nd day of September, 1993.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val Oveson Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B. Pacheco Alice Shearer
Commissioner Commissioner
NOTICE:
You have twenty (20) days after the date of the final order to file a
request for reconsideration or thirty (30) days after the date of final order
to file in Supreme Court a petition for judicial review. Utah Code Ann. ''63-46b-13(1), 63-46b-14(2)(a).
^^