92-1884
Withholding
Tax
Signed 8/13/93
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
______________________________
In Re: )
: ORDER
XXXXX,
INC., )
: Appeal Nos. 92‑1884 & 92‑1926
) Account Nos. XXXXX & XXXXX
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF
CASE
This matter came before the Utah State
Tax Commission upon a Petition for Reconsideration, dated XXXXX, filed by the
Petitioner as a result of the Commission's final decision dated XXXXX.
FINDINGS
1.
Utah Administrative Rule R861‑1‑5A(P) provides that a
Petition for Reconsideration "will allege as grounds for reconsideration
either a mistake in law or fact, or the discovery of new evidence." Under this rule, the Tax Commission may
exercise its discretion in granting or denying a Petition for Reconsideration.
2.
Petitioner has not provided any information in the form of a mistake in
law or fact or discovery of new evidence that would cause the Tax Commission to
change its earlier determined final decision in this case.
3.
Although Petitioner insists that it understood that penalties and
interest would be waived once payment and filing of taxes were accomplished,
Petitioner has not provided any evidence or documentation in support thereof.
4.
Further, simply in response to Petitioner's claim that all filings have
been timely since XXXXX, Petitioner's sales and use tax account is showing nine
late filings or payments since the first quarter of XXXXX.
DECISION AND
ORDER
Based upon the foregoing, it is the
decision and order of the Utah State Tax Commission that the Petition for
Reconsideration is denied. It is so
ordered.
DATED this 13TH day of AUGUST, 1993.
BY ORDER
OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
W. Val
Oveson* Roger O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco Alice
Shearer*
Commissioner Commissioner
NOTICE:
You have thirty (30) days after the date of final order to file in Supreme
Court a petition for judicial review.
Utah Code Ann. '63‑46b‑13(1),
63‑46b‑14(2)(a).
*Since
the hearing on this case, Chairman R. H. Hansen and Commissioner S. Blaine Willes
have been replaced by Chairman, W. Val Oveson and Commissioner Alice
Shearer. Chairman Oveson and
Commissioner Shearer participate in this decision after having been fully
informed of the facts and circumstances regarding this case.