BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________
In Re )
: INFORMAL
DECISION
XXXXX )
: Appeal No.
92-1287
)
: Account
No. XXXXX
________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the Administrative
Procedures Act and the rules of the Utah State Tax Commission for informal
proceedings. No hearing was requested,
therefore, this decision is based upon information contained in the Tax
Commission's file.
FINDINGS
Petitioner
timely filed and paid its corporate franchise tax in XXXXX. In both XXXXX and XXXXX, however, Petitioner
did not timely file and pay this tax, resulting in $$$$$ late filing penalty
and $$$$$ late payment penalty assessments for each of the two years in
question.
The
owner of XXXXX speaks English as a second language and may have misunderstood
the necessary filing and payment requirements, accounting for the late filings.
Further,
Petitioner experienced losses in both of the years in question. The owner didn't realize that a return
needed to be filed nevertheless.
DECISION AND ORDER
Petitioner
had knowledge of the corporate franchise tax return filing requirement and
payment as evidenced by the XXXXX return.
The
Tax Commission finds sufficient cause does not exist to waive the penalties
associated with the corporate franchise tax for years XXXXX and XXXXX. It is so
ordered.
DATED
this 24th day of June, 1992.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
R. H. Hansen Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B. Pacheco