90‑0105
Income
Signed 6/26/90
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
_____________________________________
XXXXX
Petitioners, ) FINDINGS OF
FACT,
) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
v. ) AND FINAL DECISION
) Appeal No. 90‑0105
COLLECTION
DIVISION OF THE )
UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION, )
) Account No. XXXXX
Respondent. )
_________________________________
STATEMENT OF
CASE
This matter came before the Utah State
Tax Commission for a formal hearing on XXXXX.
Paul F. Iwasaki, Presiding Officer, heard the matter for and in behalf
of the Tax Commission. Present by
telephone and representing the Petitioner was XXXXX.
Based upon the evidence and testimony
presented at the hearing, the Tax Commission hereby makes its:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The tax in question is income tax.
2. The period in question is XXXXX.
3. The Petitioners initially filed and
paid their XXXXX income tax return in a timely manner.
4. The petitioners were audited by the
Internal Revenue Service in the spring of XXXXX. At that time it was determined that additional taxes were owed.
The Petitioner testified that she had been informed that adjustments to their
Utah return would be required and was under the assumption that would be done
automatically.
5. The Petitioners did not report the
change in their income for their Federal income tax return to the Commission.
6. Notice of the audit changes were
sent by the Commission to the Petitioners on XXXXX.
7. The Petitioner testified that she
was not aware of the additional taxes due to the state of Utah until XXXXX when
a refund, to which she would otherwise have been entitled, for XXXXX was
applied to the XXXXX liability.
8. As a result of the late payment of
the additional taxes due for XXXXX, no penalty was assessed. However, interest calculated at the statutorily
prescribed rate was assessed.
CONCLUSIONS OF
LAW
The Tax Commission is granted the
authority to waive, reduce, or compromise penalties and interest upon a showing
of reasonable cause. (Utah Code
Annotated '59‑1‑401(8).)
DECISION AND
ORDER
In the present case, the Commission
finds that sufficient cause has not been shown which would justify a waiver or
reduction of the interest associated with the XXXXX income tax year.
In the present case, the Petitioners
had an affirmative obligation to notify the Commission of any changes made to
their federal income tax return for XXXXX, but failed to do so. Additionally, records of the Commission
reflect that three separate notices were sent to the Petitioners' address of
record which notified them of the additional taxes due. No explanation was given by the Petitioners
as to why such notices were not received.
Based upon the foregoing, the
Commission denies the Petitioners' request to waive the interest associated
with the XXXXX income tax year. It is
so ordered.
DATED this 26 day of June, 1990.
BY ORDER OF THE
UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION
R. H. Hansen Roger O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B. Pacheco G. Blaine Davis
Commissioner Commissioner
NOTICE: You
have ten (10) days after the date of the final order to file a request for
reconsideration or thirty (30) days after the date of final order to file in
Supreme Court a petition for judicial review.
Utah Code Ann. '' 63‑46b‑13(1),
63‑46b‑14(2)(a).
^^