BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
_____________________________________
XXXXX, )
Petitioner, ) FINDINGS OF FACT,
) CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW
v. ) AND FINAL DECISION
) Appeal No.
89-0495
AUDITING
DIVISION OF THE )
UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION, )
Respondent. )
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the Rules of
Administrative Procedure and the Administrative Procedures Act for formal
adjudicative proceedings on the XXXXX.
James E. Harward, Presiding Officer, heard the matter for and in behalf
of the Tax Commission. XXXXX was
present. XXXXX and XXXXX appeared
representing the Respondent.
Based
upon the recommendation of the Presiding Officer and the facts and evidence
presented at the hearing, the Tax Commission makes its
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. The tax in question is sales tax.
2. The period in question is XXXXX.
3. On XXXXX, the Petitioner purchased from the
XXXXX a XXXXX Rambler Travel Trailer.
4. As part of the purchase, the Petitioner
executed a nonresident affidavit and thereby did not pay sales tax upon the
purchase of the travel trailer.
5. The Petitioner is a resident of the state of
Utah, owns real property in the state of Utah, and has a business located in
the state of Utah.
6. The travel trailer was purchased and trailed
to Idaho and then to Arizona. The only
time the travel trailer returned to Utah was for the purpose of some warrantee
work.
7. The Petitioner has a Utah drivers license;
is registered to vote in the state of Utah, and files returns and pays income
taxes in the state of Utah.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Utah
Code Ann. §59-12-104 exempts from sales tax sales of motor vehicles to bona
fide nonresidents of the state of Utah.
Rule
R873-lV defines a resident as any person who owns, leases or rents a residence
or place of business within the State or a person engaged in a trade profession
or occupation or accepting gainful employment in this State. And finally, any
person declaring himself to be a resident of Utah to obtain privileges not ordinarily
extended to nonresidents is a resident.
DECISION AND ORDER
The
Tax Commission finds that sufficient evidence has been presented that the
Petitioner was in fact a resident of the state of Utah. Further, the Tax Commission finds sufficient
evidence that a penalty should be imposed in this matter for the improper
execution of a nonresident affidavit.
Based upon the recommendation of the Assistant Attorney General
representing the Respondent and also the agent in charge, the Tax Commission
imposes the ten percent negligence penalty in this matter and affirms the
assessment of the tax.
It
is the understanding of the Commission that the ten percent penalty and the tax
has in fact been paid by the Petitioner.
Therefore, this matter is declared closed.
DATED
this 21st day of June, 1989.
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION.
ABSENT
R. H. Hansen Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco G.
Blaine Davis
Commissioner Commissioner