BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX COMMISSION
COLLECTION DIVISION OF THE :
STATE TAX COMMISSION OF UTAH, )
v. : ORDER
: Appeal No. 88-1686
STATEMENT OF CASE
This matter came before the Utah State Tax Commission pursuant to the rules of Administrative Procedures and the Administrative Procedures Act on the XXXXX. James E. Harward, Presiding Officer, heard the matter for and on behalf of the Tax Commission. XXXXX appeared representing the Petitioner. No one appeared representing the Respondent. The presiding officer made note of the nonappearance and the default of the Respondent and took evidence and arguments as it relates to the request of the Petitioner. Based upon the foregoing and the recommendation of the presiding officer, the Tax Commission makes its:
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Respondent's delinquent nonfiling estimates for the four quarters of XXXXX and the first two quarters of XXXXX in the sum of approximately $$$$$. XXXXX has attempted to reconcile the account and collect monies, which collection attempts have been futile.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
The Tax Commission may revoke sales tax license for failure to comply with the laws of the state of Utah,59-12-106.
DECISION AND ORDER
The Tax Commission finds that the Respondent has failed to comply with the laws of the state of Utah as it relates to the collection and payment of sales tax. Therefore, the license is revoked.
DATED this 5 day of January, 1989.
BY ORDER OF THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF UTAH.
R. H. Hansen Roger O. Tew
Joe B. Pacheco G. Blaine Davis