BEFORE THE STATE TAX
COMMISSION OF UTAH
_____________________________________
UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
COLLECTION
DIVISION, )
:
Petitioner, )
: INFORMAL
DECISION
v. ) SALES TAX REVOCATION
:
XXXXX, )
: Appeal No.
86-0236
Respondent. ) Sales Tax License XXXXX
_____________________________________
STATEMENT OF CASE
This
is a Decision from an Informal Hearing regarding the Sales Tax License
Revocation of XXXXX in care of XXXXX (Respondent).
The
Sales Tax License Revocation Hearing was held on XXXXX at 3:00 p.m. in the
office of the Utah State Tax Commission.
James E. Harward, Hearing Officer, heard the matter for and in behalf of
the Tax Commission. XXXXX and XXXXX
represented the Collection Division (Petitioner). The Respondent was
represented by XXXXX and XXXXX.
During
the hearing the Respondent stated that he expected to pay his tax liability
with the income received from a government contract. The Respondent's plan did not materialize due to unforeseen
problems relating to the contract. The
Respondent lost money on the government contract even though he expected a
profit of $$$$$. The Respondent also
stated that approximately $$$$$ of the government contract had been attached by
the IRS. The Respondent still owes the
IRS about $$$$$.
The
Petitioner stated that the Respondent made his last payment on February 24,
XXXXX, and that the Respondent was behind five payments as of April 8,
XXXXX. The Petitioner also stated that
the Respondent did not file a return or pay a tax for the first quarter of
XXXXX.
After
reviewing the evidence presented at the hearing, the Commission makes the
following determinations:
1. Respondent was issued Sales Tax License No.
XXXXX in care of XXXXX. Respondent was
a corporation at the time.
2. Respondent was responsible for the collection
of sales taxes on the sale of his goods and services and was required to remit
these taxes to the State Tax Commission.
Utah Code Ann. § 59-15-5 (1953). Respondent did not properly remit the full
amount of sales tax collected each quarter.
4. The Utah State Tax Commission is vested with
the authority to revoke the license of "any person violating any provision
of this [Sales Tax] Act . . . ." Utah Code Ann. § 59-15-3 (1953).
DECISION AND ORDER
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY DECIDED:
1. That Respondent's Sales Tax License No.
XXXXX is hereby revoked for failure to comply with the provisions of the Utah
Sales Tax Act, Utah Code Ann. §
59-15-5.
2. That Respondent, in care of XXXXX, is
ordered to close the doors of his business and deliver his sales tax license to
the Utah State Tax Commission. Failure
to comply with this order may result in criminal prosecution being taken
against the Respondent. The Revocation
of the Respondent's Sales Tax License is effective immediately.
DATED
this 7 day of August, 1986.
BY ORDER OF THE STATE TAX COMMISSION OF UTAH.
R. H. Hansen Roger
O. Tew
Chairman Commissioner
Joe B.
Pacheco
Commissioner