01-0476
Income Tax
Signed 8/8/01
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
PETITIONER, )
) ORDER
Petitioner, )
) Appeal No. 01-0476
v. ) Account No. #####
)
TAXPAYER SERVICES
DIVISION OF ) Tax Type:
Income Tax
THE UTAH STATE TAX )
COMMISSION, ) Judge: Phan
)
Respondent. )
_____________________________________
Presiding:
Jane Phan,
Administrative Law Judge
Appearances:
For Petitioner: PETITIONER
For Respondent: Laron Lind, Assistant Attorney General
Inez Thomas
STATEMENT
OF THE CASE
This matter came before
the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions
of Utah Code Ann. '59-1-502.5, on July 2,
2001.
Petitioner is appealing
Respondent's denial of a refund request for the periods 1993, 1995 and
1996. Respondent denied the refund
request because it was made after the applicable statute of limitations.
Petitioner argues that
he had hired a tax preparation firm to prepare his Utah individual income tax
returns for the years 1993, 1995 and 1996.
Each return indicated that he was owed a refund. Petitioner states that he "assumed both
the federal and state returns were filed since they [tax preparer] provided me
with copies of both returns." Petitioner did not receive the refunds but
claimed that he assumed the refunds were taken by the Internal Revenue Service
("IRS") because of a federal tax lien. He argues that he in good faith thought they were properly filed
so he should be allowed the refund.
Respondent points out
that Petitioner did not file returns for 1993, 1995 and 1996 until February 14,
2001. Utah Code Ann. 59-10-529 requires
that a claim for refund is filed within three years and six months. The 1995 and 1996 returns were not prepared
by the tax preparer until April 1999,
and then Petitioner held on to them for an additional time until February 2001
before they were filed. Petitioner did
not file his federal returns with the IRS until May 14, 2001 for the 1995 and
1996 years.
APPLICABLE
LAW
If a refund or credit is
due because the amount of tax deducted and withheld from wages exceeds the
actual tax due, a refund or credit may not be made or allowed unless the
taxpayer or his legal representative files with he commission a tax return
claiming the refund or credit: (I) within three years from the due date of the
return, plus the period of any extensions of time for filing the return
provided for in Subsection (7)(c);
. . . (Utah Code Ann. Sec. 59-10-529 (7).)
DECISION
AND ORDER
The statute of
limitations is strictly construed and even assuming the situation was as
represented by Petitioner, there is no basis for waiving the statute of
limitations and allowing payment of the refund. It is Petitioner's responsibility to see that the income tax
returns are filed and filed within the three year period in order to obtain a
refund. The typical practice of tax
preparers, unless it is electronically filed, is to prepare and sign the return
and give it to the taxpayer for his or her signature. The taxpayer then mails
the return to the state and IRS. In
addition, if a refund is taken to be applied to another liability, written
notice is mailed to the taxpayer. In
this case, Petitioner did not make sure that his returns were filed, nor did he
check on the status of the refund claims, either with the State Tax Commission,
or the IRS whom he thought received the funds.
Based on the foregoing,
Petitioner's claim for refund of income tax for the years 1993, 1995 and 1996
is hereby denied. It is so ordered.
This decision does not
limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing.
However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and
Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request
within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal
Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed
to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address,
and appeal number:
Utah
State Tax Commission
Appeals
Division
210
North 1950 West
Salt
Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure to request a
Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.
DATED this 8th
day of August, 2001.
____________________________________
Jane Phan
Administrative Law Judge
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION.
The Commission has
reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.
DATED this 8th
day of August, 2001.
Pam Hendrickson R.
Bruce Johnson
Commission Chair Commissioner
Palmer DePaulis Marc
B. Johnson
Commissioner Commissioner