00-1620
Sales Tax
Signed 5/6/02
BEFORE THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION
____________________________________
PETITIONER, )
) ORDER
Petitioner, ) Appeal No. 00-1620
)
v. ) Account No. #####
)
TAXPAYER SERVICES
DIVISION ) Tax Type:
Sales Tax
OF THE UTAH STATE TAX ) Tax Period:
COMMISSION, )
)
Respondent. ) Judge: Davis
_____________________________________
Presiding:
G. Blaine Davis,
Administrative Law Judge
Appearances:
For Petitioner: PETITIONER REP, Attorney at Law
PETITIONER
For Respondent: Mr. Gale Francis, Assistant Attorney
General
Mr. Stan Allen, from the Taxpayer
Services Division
Ms. Karen McFerson, from the Taxpayer
Services Division
STATEMENT
OF THE CASE
This matter came before
the Utah State Tax Commission for an Initial Hearing pursuant to the provisions
of Utah Code Ann. '59-1-502.5 on September
18, 2001.
Respondent imposed a
personal penalty assessment against Petitioner, pursuant to Utah Code Ann.
§59-1-302, for failing to collect, truthfully account for, and pay over the
sales and use taxes for COMPANY A.
The periods in question
are the fourth quarter of 1999, first quarter and second quarter of 2000.
Petitioner is an
accountant, and was a director, secretary, and the registered agent for COMPANY
A. Petitioner also represented he was a
part owner of the business through the third quarter of 1999. Then, because of financial difficulties of
the business, and differences of opinion with the other owner of the business,
Mr. NAME, Petitioner sold his interest in the business, and received a total
payment of $$$$$ for his share of the business. The amounts received by him were received in the year 2000.
The sales tax returns
are filed and paid through the third quarter, 1999.
Petitioner signed a
resolution with the bank removing his name from the bank account and making the
signatories on the bank account Mr. NAME and Mrs. NAME. That resolution is not dated, but Petitioner
represented it was signed in October, 1999.
Petitioner represented
he does not have any records of the business and has not been involved with the
business since September 1999.
The business, COMPANY A,
has not filed sales and use tax returns for the fourth quarter 1999 or for the
first and second quarters of 2000. The
assessment of taxes is an estimate made by Respondent based upon prior filings
of the business.
When Petitioner
terminated his relationship with the business, he did not go to the Utah
Department of Commerce and have his name removed from the records of the
business. Therefore, he was still
listed with the Utah Department of Commerce as the registered agent, a director
and secretary of the business.
APPLICABLE LAW
The relevant portions of
Utah Code Ann. §59-1-302 provide as follows:
(1) The provisions
of this section apply to the following taxes in this title:
(a) state and local
sales and use tax under Chapter 12, Parts 1 and 2;
. . . .
(d) public transit tax under Chapter 12, Part 5;
(e) tourism, recreation, cultural, and convention
facilities tax under Chapter 12, Part 6;
. . . .
(2) Any person
required to collection, truthfully account for, and pay over any tax listed in
Subsection (1) who willfully fails to collect the tax, fails to truthfully
account for and pay over the tax, or attempts in any manner to evade or defeat
any tax or the payment of the tax, shall be liable for a penalty equal to the
total amount of the tax evaded, not collected, not accounted for, or not paid
over. This penalty is in addition to
other penalties provided by law.
. . . .
(7)(a) In any hearing before the commission and in any
judicial review of the hearing, the commission and the court shall consider any
inference and evidence that a person has willfully failed to collect,
truthfully account for, or pay over any tax listed in Subsection (1).
(b) It is prima facie evidence that a person has
willfully failed to collect, truthfully account for, or pay over any of the
taxes listed in Subsection (1) if the commission or a court finds that the person
charged with the responsibility of collecting, accounting for, or paying over
the taxes:
(i) made a voluntary, conscious, and intentional
decision to prefer other creditors over the state government or utilize the tax
money for personal purposes;
(ii) recklessly disregarded obvious or known
risks, which resulted in the failure to collect, account for, or pay over the
tax; or
(iii) failed to investigate or to correct
mismanagement, having notice that the tax was not or is not being collected,
accounted for, or paid over as provided by law.
(c) The commission or court need not find a bad
motive or specific intent to defraud the government or deprive it of revenue to
establish willfulness under this section.
DISCUSSION
In
this matter, it appears the sales and use tax returns through the third quarter
1999 have been filed and paid. The
testimony was that Petitioner was involved with this company only through the
third quarter 1999, and was not involved for the fourth quarter 1999 or the
first or second quarters of 2000. It is
also clear that Petitioner no longer has any real relationship with the
business, and for the periods at issue did not have the legal ability or right
to collect, truthfully account for or pay over the taxes, not even by paying
the taxes to other creditors.
Petitioner
did fail to remove his name from the records of the Utah Department of
Commerce, so he did not give notice to creditors that he was no longer involved
with the business. Nevertheless, it is
determined that he did not meet the statutory terms of failing to collect,
truthfully account for or pay over any taxes as provided by that section.
DECISION
AND ORDER
Based upon the
foregoing, the Commission hereby determines that Petitioner was not a
responsible party for the periods at issue, and was not required to collect,
truthfully account for, or pay over the taxes for which the penalty has been
assessed. Therefore, the personal
penalty assessment is hereby set aside, and Petitioner is relieved from that
penalty.
This decision does not
limit a party's right to a Formal Hearing.
However, this Decision and Order will become the Final Decision and
Order of the Commission unless any party to this case files a written request
within thirty (30) days of the date of this decision to proceed to a Formal
Hearing. Such a request shall be mailed
to the address listed below and must include the Petitioner's name, address,
and appeal number:
Utah
State Tax Commission
Appeals
Division
210
North 1950 West
Salt
Lake City, Utah 84134
Failure to request a
Formal Hearing will preclude any further appeal rights in this matter.
DATED this 6th day of May ,
2002.
____________________________________
G. Blaine Davis
Administrative Law Judge
BY ORDER OF THE UTAH STATE TAX
COMMISSION.
The Commission has
reviewed this case and the undersigned concur in this decision.
DATED this 6th day of May ,
2002.
Pam Hendrickson R.
Bruce Johnson
Commission Chair Commissioner
Palmer DePaulis Marc
B. Johnson
Commissioner Commissioner